Posted on 03/22/2008 9:14:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Munger believes Obama, unfairly, now faces serious questions about his electability.Unfairly?
What does "unfairly" mean in terms of electability?
Electability is a purely mathematical estimation of whether or not the number of supporters out there is large enough to enable victory at the polls.
To say someone is "unelectable", or to question someones "electability" has nothing to do with fairness, unless you believe that the universe someowe owes someone an elected job.
If I question someone's electability, I might be wrong -- in the sense that I'm misjudging the actual numbers out there in the electorate-- but it's impossible for me to be unfair.
Clinton’s going to win the nomination. The “superdelegates” have got to be very worried at this point about Osama’s gaffs. I predict they will give Clinton the nomination and use her uncounted “wins” in MI and FL as political cover.If you really believe that, you've got a tremendous opportunity over at https://www.intrade.com/# where $100 wager will return you $500 when she's nominated. Go for it.
I personally wouldn't touch that bet with a 10-foot pole. I think the true odds are more like 20-1 against her.
(Though I personally wouldn't bet the other side because I'm not a big fan of laying odds, as opposed to taking odds.)
Nice try Mr. Alberts.
The Marxist hillary has the sign “racist” permanently affixed to her forehead with a railroad spike. The inner city voter fraud machine will be closed to racist hillary on election day.
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a number precinct captains in places like Detroit or Cleveland come forward to “confess” and expose hillary’s voter fraud network.
A 527 might.
On that note, I’m wondering who controls the vote fraud machine in Philly. If it’s the state party, Rendell is a big Hillary supporter. If it’s the locals, I’ve got to think they’re big Obama supporters.
His partiotism, like Kerry’s is unquestionable; put simply, each is an anti-American marxist with no patriotism at all.
Hey, thanks! I think I will!
Don’t bet more than you can afford to lose, cause I think you’re gonna lose.
As I recall the story, she gave two speeches which contained that line. She added the word really in the second speech. It definitely wasn't in the first one.
McCain doesn’t have the balls to attack the Obomination like that. He’s still playing soft ball with the liberals thinking they’ll vote for him. He’s an idiot.
[Eight months after the fact] Barack Obama blasts pro-Hamas Op-Ed
Jerusalem Post | March 24, 2008 | RON KAMPEAS/ JTA
Posted on 03/23/2008 10:19:29 PM EDT by rdl6989
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990450/posts
Bill Clinton: Democratic race could come down to NC vote
Associated Press | 03/21/2008 | MIKE BAKER
Posted on 03/22/2008 5:25:48 PM EDT by george76
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1990008/posts
Quislings embedded in the U.S. Government, especially the State Department, CIA and other career bureaucracies serving career politicians may be smart and even brilliant, just like their namesake Vidkun Quisling.
However, just like Quisling, their greatly overestimate their own importance and the admiration that they think their underlings have for them.
To some, they are mere opportunists. To most, they are mere tools to advance the careers of the next generation of opportunists.
If public service was really treated as an opportunity to serve rather than a lifetime entitlement to live as a member of the ruling class, then a plan such as this to give the public sector the same sense of shared fate as the private sector rather than to further empower a gated community in a parallel universe would be given serious consideration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.