Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2008 4:43:11 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jdm

I’m sure that butt-faced Michael Moore could ram it through.


2 posted on 03/22/2008 4:52:12 PM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

“Wilders’s point has already been proved, hasn’t it?”

#

Yes.


3 posted on 03/22/2008 4:52:35 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Another article on the same subject:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020419.php

#

Previously...

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020418.php

March 22, 2008

“Netherlands anti-Wilders protestor: “The government could really do something. That’s in the interest of the country — stop him, just stop him””


4 posted on 03/22/2008 4:54:39 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
Jamming, it is being jammed by the complaint tools.

Happens all the time with conservative content on youtube.

It is the same with slap suits, intimidation by complaint.

There is a time honored civil redress though. It is called “tortious interference with a beneficial business relationship.”

IOW the complaint was filed just to interfere with a contractual relationship which has nothing to do with the complaining party.

5 posted on 03/22/2008 5:03:04 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Absolutely chilling - the complete moral cowardice.


6 posted on 03/22/2008 5:03:12 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

“Is paragraph 7 the operative one, do you think — or is it paragraph 10?”

No, its paragraph 1 thats at issue. And according to that paragraph this company would never allow such a movie.


7 posted on 03/22/2008 5:04:16 PM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

More about Wilders and the movie.

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/815

Instead of showing a movie about Islam as it really is, they will show an anti-Christian movie and everyone will be happy.


8 posted on 03/22/2008 5:05:50 PM PDT by 353FMG (Vote for the Person who will do the least damage to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

He may just have to publish it over peer-to-peer networks.


9 posted on 03/22/2008 5:06:59 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Seeing that NetSolutions “disclaimer” chilled me to the bone. Is this the future of every Western nation—terrified deference to Islam?


11 posted on 03/22/2008 5:44:33 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Put it up with Torrent and nobody can block it.


12 posted on 03/22/2008 6:22:59 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
Network Solutions owns the monopoly on all .COM domain names.
The corporate weenies at Network Solutions happily accept
hundreds of thousands of registrations for porn, sado, and sodomite domains, but cower behind their Terms of Service when it comes to hosting a single media piece that dares to address real issues about Islam, the so-called “religion of peace”.

I can only recall that the left loves to scold others who object to the garbage they push out to the public, that if they don't like it, they don't have to watch. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

13 posted on 03/22/2008 6:28:05 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

First it should be posted to multiple groups on USENET, “the other half of the Internet”. This will be the most rapid and clean propagation. Then the USENET subscribers both advertise to their friends and set it up as torrent files.

This way, it will enter the eMule and Gnutella2 P2P nets as trusted files, since there will no doubt be lots of malicious hoaxes.


14 posted on 03/22/2008 7:02:17 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm; knighthawk

bttt


16 posted on 03/22/2008 7:55:32 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson