Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat; Gabz
...would create unintended loopholes in the law. For instance they say a bar might call itself a private club in order to allow patrons to smoke.

Awwww...are the little nanny-staters afraid they won't be able to control our private lives?

7 posted on 03/20/2008 7:31:46 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
...would create unintended loopholes in the law. For instance they say a bar might call itself a private club in order to allow patrons to smoke.

Awwww...are the little nanny-staters afraid they won't be able to control our private lives?

They should be delighted and supportive....they already tax the tobacco and with this they could require expensive new licenses.....

13 posted on 03/20/2008 7:52:49 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gondring
...would create unintended loopholes in the law. For instance they say a bar might call itself a private club in order to allow patrons to smoke.

What's wrong with that? Then the nonsmokers couldn't come in and do their fake coughing and other silly tactics.

23 posted on 03/21/2008 5:26:21 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Bill Clinton: HILLARY!'s other big ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson