Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New InsiderAdvantage Poll Obama’s speech meets unsympathetic ears with Americans
Southern Political Report ^ | March 20, 2008 | Gary Reese

Posted on 03/20/2008 4:56:52 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch

Edited on 03/20/2008 5:56:59 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

— Barack Obama’s speech about race on Tuesday impressed many who witnessed it or read it. But most of America did neither, and many of them -- white and black -- were less persuaded of the speech’s capacity to heal racial wounds, or to put the issue of race behind Obama as he continues his quest for the White House.

That’s according to a new poll by InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion.

First, we screened poll respondents to find those who were aware that Obama’s pastor was in the news. A startling 82% knew about Obama’s speech, and about the controversy surrounding the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Of those who knew about the controversy and the speech, we asked, “Taking all this into account, are you more or less likely to support Obama for president?”

Less likely (52%) More likely (19%) About the same (27%) No opinion (2%)

The poll was conducted March 19 among 1,051 Americans. After filtering out those not aware of Rev. Wright and Obama’s speech about him, the sample is 807, for a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2%. The data have been weighted for age, race, gender and partisan affiliation.

It’s easy to read too much into this poll. In the long-term, Obama’s speech about the racially insensitive political and social views of Rev. Wright may come to its final resting place in history books for being a signal moment in America’s tortured story of race relations. But in the short-attention-span theatre of a heated presidential race, it may amount to little more than a loud blip in an ever-fluxing news cycle.

Even so, the poll displays no numbers flattering to Obama. Most startling is that blacks by 56% to 31% said the speech made them less likely to vote for him. That may be because Obama had some gutsy perspectives on blacks as well as on whites, and black observers of the speech may have been annoyed. But it’s hard to imagine that there’s going to be an appreciable retreat by blacks from the Obama column.

Democrats disapproved 48% to 28%, which looks sobering for Obama on first glance, but might portend otherwise. If blacks irritated by Obama’s remarks will return to the fold, than impressing whites is probably a more vital read on the numbers. And Democratic whites were more sympathetic with the speech’s message than black ones.

The disturbing numbers for Obama are the independent voters. By 56% to 13%, they said they’re less likely to vote for him because of the speech.

“In my weekly Creators Syndicate column that I penned just hours before this poll, I wrote that I had no idea how the country would react to the Obama speech,” said Matt Towery, CEO of InsiderAdvantage.

“And I’m always wary of polling race. People aren’t always completely forthcoming on such a touchy subject.

“But there’s no way around the numbers as they read all across the board. They are consistent in every demographic we measured. Most people didn’t have a gut positive reaction to Obama’s speech,” he said.

“Doubtless many formed their opinions not on the speech itself, but on reports of it filtered through their favorite news media outlets. So intended or unintended biases of media may have trickled down to many poll respondents.

“It’s important to note, however, that we carefully crafted the poll’s questions. We never mentioned the words ‘race’ or ‘controversy,’ or explained what all the fuss was about. Our first question was simply, ‘Are you aware of the situation regarding Sen. Barack Obama’s church pastor and the past public remarks he has made?’

“So there was a deliberate effort not to ‘push poll’ respondents, or to influence their answers in any way,” Towery said. “Also note that only one out of 50 poll respondents had no opinion.”

The results of the poll, while not reassuring to Obama, can be probably be overcome as other events unfold. Already the news cycle is turning to the fifth anniversary of the Iraq invasion.

Still, the charismatic Democratic presidential frontrunner likely has created a genuine problem for himself: In order to fizzle the flame that Rev. Wright ignited with his passionate, public racism, Obama had to forfeit the promise implicit in this campaign to date; that of moving beyond and above racialist rhetoric in American politics.

On Tuesday, he changed course and said essentially the opposite: That we all need to face our unpleasant history. His words mirrored a rhetorical and policy mantra that many black public figures of the last generation have tried to make mainstream.

In a year of great unease over foreign wars and a wilting economy, kicking the (lightly) sleeping dog of race in America may have been a mistake, unavoidable though it may have been. Click here for crosstabs.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; ihaveanexcusespeech; nobama; obama; wright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2008 4:56:53 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

But the speach caused a stiring in Criss Matthews’ pants.


2 posted on 03/20/2008 4:59:43 PM PDT by Bertha Fanation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
I think he could have put it behind him by denouncing Wright and saying racism of whatever kind has no place in American life. But by refusing to disown Wright and saying in effect there was something recondite in his analysis about American society, Obama created more of a headache for himself. How is he going to tell us too look beyond race when he belongs to a church associated with black separatism cum superiority? I think that's one contradiction he can't overcome even with the best rhetoric.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 03/20/2008 5:01:18 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
The poll was conducted March 26 among 1,051 Americans.

With one of them cool DeLoreans, I'll bet.

4 posted on 03/20/2008 5:01:19 PM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

“The poll was conducted March 26 among 1,051 Americans”

Huh


5 posted on 03/20/2008 5:02:13 PM PDT by bereanway (Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Stop Calling Obama A Liberal !!!
Start calling him what he is, “A Living Room Leftist”. Read his speeches. He is a Leftist Social Engineer regarding our schools, welfare, health care, etc. This is not a Right Wing Opinion” but his own words stating what is his agenda. Massive increases in Government controls, spending and taxes. Obama has a Leftist approach to US foreign policy. He voted against the USA’s ending one of the most evil regimes of the last part of the 20th Century. He voted to keep in place a regime that caused the death of a million Iranians, the murder of hundred of thousands of Iraq citizens including children and women, rape rooms and putting people into wood chippers.


6 posted on 03/20/2008 5:02:27 PM PDT by EdArt (free to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bertha Fanation

Look how much bending over backwards there was to A) explain the results and B) explain how the questions weren’t in any way biased.


7 posted on 03/20/2008 5:03:30 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bereanway

Type O! Maybe March 19?


8 posted on 03/20/2008 5:04:20 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
“Doubtless many formed their opinions not on the speech itself, but on reports of it filtered through their favorite news media outlets.

All the news reports I've seen said it was a greater speech than those of Lincoln, FDR, and JFK all rolled up together. A timeless, historical moment. Even a kairos moment (a word I have rarely heard since I last studied providential ideas of time and history).

9 posted on 03/20/2008 5:04:44 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

“Obama got run over by his Grandma.

He’s a hateful fool who had to run his mouth.

Now his useful idiots might all still love him,

but all of his poll numbers are goin’ south.

Obama thinks America is awful-

he says that life here’s so unfair.

And grandma’s rotten ‘cause she raised him

to be a lousy Ivy League-schooled millionaire.

He hates Grandma ‘cause she’s fearful.

He deplores the way her racial views were shaped.

Many thousands of whites could give him an earful—

The ones who blacks have murdered, robbed, and raped.

Ohhhhh.....

Obama got run over by his Grandma.

Been getting his big ears boxed ever since.

Now you may say there’s no such thing as karma,

But as for me and Grandma, we’re convinced.”


10 posted on 03/20/2008 5:05:14 PM PDT by Mac from Cleveland (Three rules for a happy life-Fill what's empty, empty what's full, and scratch what itches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
>>>Less likely (52%) More likely (19%) About the same (27%) No opinion (2%) <<<

Good speech O'bama!

Looks like Granny pulled him under the bus with her!!!

11 posted on 03/20/2008 5:12:24 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdArt
He voted against the USA’s ending one of the most evil regimes of the last part of the 20th Century. He voted to keep in place a regime that caused the death of a million Iranians, the murder of hundred of thousands of Iraq citizens including children and women, rape rooms and putting people into wood chippers.

What votes of Obama's are you referring to? Obama wasn't elected to the Senate until more than a year after the start of the Iraq war.

12 posted on 03/20/2008 5:13:58 PM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EdArt

Anyone seen Hillary around here??

13 posted on 03/20/2008 5:16:31 PM PDT by B-Cause (Opportunity knocks on your door every day -- answer it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AHerald; bereanway

Now it reads:

“The poll was conducted March 19 among 1,051 Americans.”


14 posted on 03/20/2008 5:18:57 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
Quibble: the original link says March 19th, not March 26th.

IMO, this Wright-racism issue is not going to go away. When you are so weak on substance that image is all you have, a stain like this is very loud. Voters in big blue cities (where the media would like to pretend all political decisions take place) may not give a darn, but the rest of the country is spooked by the black-kkk-like hatred of whitey espoused by Wright.

This isn't some toxic person who happens to be a supporter (as in usual guilt-by-association games) - Wright is Obama's life mentor, spiritual leader, and personal friend of over 20 years. And no matter how much of his water boys in the media gush to the contrary, Obama dropped the ball on his latest speech. The history of white racism in America will not be cleansed by an associate of and apologist for black racists.

15 posted on 03/20/2008 5:26:17 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I don't.

The hypocrisy is is too intense.

Obama wanted Imus removed from his radio show. In his argument for it he mentioned he didn't want his daughters hearing such things.

Except we have Obama taking his daughter to “church” to hear far worse all of their lives... To hear that our government is run by Jews/whites that created AIDs to kill blacks... That they are sending in drugs to black communities to kill them... That our government is the biggest terrorist in history... To pray for God to damn America...

Can't have it both ways. What Imus did pales in comparison.

16 posted on 03/20/2008 5:26:37 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

How could reaction be anything BUT unsympathetic? Here we have a 20-year member of a racist, exclusivist institution presuming to lecture the rest of us on racism. Here we have a man who continues to expose his innocent children to the ethos of racism and hatred prevailing at Trinity pontificating on the need for racial harmony. Here we have a man whose self-described “mentor” is a fulminating, frothing-at-the- mouth racial bigot presenting himself as a tribune of tolerance. Here we have a man who destroys his own grandmother's reputation to advance his own career posturing as a moral leader. What a joke.
17 posted on 03/20/2008 5:29:29 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1

Exactly.


18 posted on 03/20/2008 5:31:03 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EdArt

I see your post all over and I have no idea what you mean by Living room leftist.


19 posted on 03/20/2008 5:32:49 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

See your Quibble and raise a Bicker.

They changed it after my post.


20 posted on 03/20/2008 5:48:03 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson