Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Charges U.S. With Discrimination
Human Events ^ | 03/20/2008 | Thomas P. Kilgannon

Posted on 03/20/2008 2:51:03 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary

Dulles, Virginia -- The history of the disaster that submerged “The Big Easy,” in 2005 has already been written. In it, race plays a greater role than the real problems exposed by Katrina -- the failure of government at all levels and the unwarranted faith citizens place in bureaucracy. Now, the New Orleans race card is being played again -- this time by busybodies beyond our borders.

This month, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination issued its opinion on Katrina’s aftermath. “The Committee,” the report states, “remains concerned about the disparate impact that [Hurricane Katrina] continues to have on low-income African American residents, many of whom continue to be displaced after more than two years after the hurricane.”

Opining on the matter was not enough for the international know-it-alls -- they further blessed us with their recommendation on how to fix the perceived ills. The United States, they said, should “increase its efforts in order to facilitate the return of persons displaced by Hurricane Katrina to their homes.” Short of that, the U.S. must “guarantee access to adequate and affordable housing,” for Katrina victims.

The criticism was too much for Louisiana Senator David Vitter. “Once again, the UN has decided to inject itself into the New Orleans public housing debate, even though some of the UN advisors who have been critical of the recovery process have never actually been on the ground to see things first hand,” Mr. Vitter responded.

Vitter was referring to Miloon Kothari, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on adequate housing and Gay McDougall, the UN Independent Expert on minority issues. On February 28, from their international ivory tower in Geneva, the two issued a statement saying they were “deeply concerned” about the public housing situation in New Orleans and its impact on African-Americans.

Specifically, the two object to the razing of four public housing projects in the city, which would make it possible to erect new facilities. They denounced the demolition and stated that for African-American residents, it results in “the denial of internationally recognized human rights.” Preventing former public housing residents from returning to their homes because of project demolition, they said, “would in practice amount to an eviction” -- an action prohibited by “international human rights law.” These international ombudsmen then demanded that “the Federal Government and State and local authorities...immediately halt the demolitions of public housing in New Orleans.”

That the United Nations makes these demands of an American community is appalling. It is compounded when one learns that David Hammer, a staff writer with the New Orleans Times-Picayune, spoke to the two global critics and confirmed that “they haven’t been to New Orleans since Hurricane Katrina.”

“We haven’t done a formal fact-finding in New Orleans,” Kothari admitted to Hammer. “The intention of our statement was to raise issues, to say, look these are the problems, and we expect a formal response from the State Department.”

The State Department should tell Kothari to pound sand. Mayor Ray Nagin is perfectly capable of handling the situation. (Check that. Actually, he’s not, but he was elected by the people, and in the U.S. that is how our system works.) Had Kothari & Company done any fact-finding, they would have learned that, according to a Housing Authority of New Orleans survey, only 20 percent of residents want to return to the public housing unit in which they resided prior to 2005. They might have also discovered, as David Hammer reported, that the public housing demolitions were approved by the New Orleans City Council.

These same irresponsible tactics were used by the UN in 2006. Then, the UN Committee Against Torture issued scathing report on the U.S. detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, demanding the facility be closed, even though none of the UN inspectors actually visited Gitmo.

Mr. Vitter wants a hearing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to determine if the United Nations is focusing on the correct priorities. He is not going to get his hearing anytime soon. But I can give him his answer -- no, housing issues in New Orleans are none of the UN’s business. Nor are race relations, discrimination, health care, education, border enforcement, employment, interpretation of the First Amendment, or the application of the death penalty the business of the United Nations. Each of these issues, as practiced in the United States, was criticized in the UN’s report.

Vitter is on the right track however -- the UN should be held accountable. Otherwise, it seems Congress is spending billions of dollars that are only being flushed down a Turtle Bay toilet.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: davidvitter; humanrights
Once again, another reason to kick the UN to the curb!
1 posted on 03/20/2008 2:51:03 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

How many Africians have been killed in Darfur and Rawanda? I think the UN should take a look in the mirror. I wish we had some politicians with a pair that would yank some $$ from these “one world order” bigots.


2 posted on 03/20/2008 2:54:43 PM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
The UN doesn't get three things:
  1. Federalism in the US.
  2. The incredible corruption of Democrat politicians.
  3. The really way out there incredible corruption of Democrat politicians in Louisiana.
We've already sent them bazillions for levees and flood control and they diverted that money. Now we should send them MORE?

The UN can go suck eggs.

3 posted on 03/20/2008 2:55:46 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Since B. Hussein O. is only “Half black” can we assume that if he were president he would have sent only “Half” the help needed to N.O.? Inquiring mind wants to know.
4 posted on 03/20/2008 3:07:23 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Excuse me, but the Katrina welfare recipients who moved here are so much better off that they have no intention of returning to the Ninth Ward. The church deeded over to them prime, and I’m talking in the million$ PRIME acreage for their own non-taxable “church”. They’ve already sold off part of it to developers so they’re hardly “poor victims”.


5 posted on 03/20/2008 3:10:10 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

“remains concerned about the disparate impact that [Hurricane Katrina] continues to have on low-income African American residents, many of whom continue to be displaced after more than two years after the hurricane.”

Ok, first of all, more whites were impacted, if I recall correctly. The focus on blacks in NO to the exclusion of whites everywhere else in the impacted area the size of Britian is the real race issue.

Second, NO remains problematic while other areas have recovered for one simple reason - democrats are running the show in NO.


6 posted on 03/20/2008 3:37:13 PM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

God, how I hate the f***ing U.N. Don’t those idiots realize that the black population of New Orleans was 67% when Katrina hit? That’s 2/3 of the population! Of course the number of blacks affected are going to be higher! It’s also true that blacks are not renovating their damaged neighborhoods. The Vietnamese population in New Orleans East didn’t even wait for FEMA or the government to start doing anything, they took care of the problem themselves and rebuilt on their own! The blacks in Mississippi had no problem taking care of business, either; they did what they had to do and began to rebuild. I lived in New Orleans for many years. Believe me, as a general comment, New Orleans is the laziest city in America, and its black population (again as a generalization) is the laziest.


7 posted on 03/20/2008 4:41:11 PM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
I swear to God that anyone who had the stones to make a central campaign issue of getting the UN out of the US he/she would have my vote.

Why do we put up with these twits?

Move them to Islamoeurope.

8 posted on 03/20/2008 4:45:32 PM PDT by alarm rider ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
"Nor are race relations, discrimination, health care, education, border enforcement, employment, interpretation of the First Amendment, or the application of the death penalty the business of the United Nations. Each of these issues, as practiced in the United States, was criticized in the UN’s report."

The U.N. can stay out of our 2nd amendment too!

9 posted on 03/20/2008 4:52:00 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Vitter was referring to Miloon Kothari, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on adequate housing and Gay McDougall, the UN Independent Expert on minority issues.

A Special Rapporteur, on adequate housing, huh. And Gay is an Independent Expert on minority issues.

If any should wonder how they came to their conclusions, just remember that when your only tool is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail. If my job was shoveling dog sh!t off the street, I could make a case that the problem is that there just isn't enough funding for poop removal.

Special Rapporteur? How the hell do you get jobs like this?

10 posted on 03/20/2008 4:59:53 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid ... even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson