Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Promoting the Abuse of Young Women
dansargis.org ^ | March 20, 2008 | Dan Sargis

Posted on 03/20/2008 6:27:01 AM PDT by Dr.Syn

 

 

 

Promoting the Abuse of Young Women

March 20, 2009 

The real damage caused by the Luv Gov Elliot Spitzer has little to do with his career, his wife or his children.  

Sadly, but predictably, the real damage caused by Spitzer once again falls heavily on the shoulders of middle class working Americans.  You know...the same people that liberal hypocrites like Spitzer and his wife are always pandering to...and vowing to protect. 

This is little different from the Clinton-Lewinsky mess. 

In both cases you have narcissistic liberal politicians who, when given the sacred trust of the electorate, chose to abuse that sacred trust for self-satisfaction. 

In both cases you have liberal scumbags whose Ivy League law school educated spouses portend to be passionate about helping children. 

In both cases you have these “high powered” wives who, once their husbands are caught with their pants down, become more concerned about political and legal damage control than what has been wantonly wrought upon America’s youth.  Those same “children” their campaign machines promote as the center focus of these political wives’ concern. 

Somehow they serendipitously go from standing by “the children” to standing by their man and all the benefits derived therefrom.   

It’s not as though F. Scott Fitzgerald didn’t warn us about this game over eighty years ago in the Great Gatsby, “They were careless people...they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made." 

When Bill Clinton, in 1998, sanctified oral sex as not sex nor immoral (it was only “inappropriate”) to save his butt in the Lewinsky scandal, the president of the United States (at the time) set an example for the youth of this nation...and apparently his “high profile” Ivy league educated lawyer wife agreed with him. 

Not only did she not condemn his behavior and rationale...she and her surrogates supported it and the message it sent our nation’s youth...oral sex is not sex, it is “a vast right-wing conspiracy”. 

In 2005, the NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics) reported a shocking increase in the number of American teenagers practicing oral sex (more than 50% of American teenagers form 15 to 19 and 70% from 18 to 19). 

Kelly Boggs of the Baptist Press noted that, “It was Clinton’s escapades with Monica Lewinsky that made oral sex a household topic in 1998. The teens targeted in the NCHS survey were between 8 and 12 years old when the story was being discussed daily on television and radio...There is no doubt that the popularity of the topic at the time...helped to contribute to the attitudes of many of today’s teenagers.” 

Additionally, in 2007, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that, “Patients who had a lifetime number of 6 or more oral-sex partners were 3.4 times more likely to have oropharyngeal (throat) cancer.” 

The Clintons recklessly careen through two presidential terms and retire from office to: make 10s of $millions; see their prep school educated daughter graduate from Stanford; get Hillary elected to the U.S. Senate and run for the presidency part deux. 

A post-coital Monica Lewinsky rises from the obscurity of a porky mediocre rich girl to being a “famous” porky mediocre rich girl.  Just another good example to live by...Want to be famous?  Just fill your mouth with anything except the pearls of wisdom.   

Meanwhile, the teenagers of America conclude (by presidential example) that oral sex is not sex (and even somewhat presidential) and increased their odds of getting throat cancer by over 300%. 

America’s working parents thank Mr. and Mrs. Clinton for their “leadership” example. 

And the same can be said for the Wall-Spitzers. 

A very hypocritical and pathetic Governor Spitzer literally gets caught with his pants down for a nothing special hooker and America suffers phantom disgrace pains with the abused spouse, Harvard Law School graduate Silda Wall Spitzer. 

Simultaneously, the obscure nobody hooker, Kristen, aka Ashley Youmans aka Ashley Alexandra Dupre, went from being an obscure hooker to “famous”. 

This teenage runaway, or whatever she was, is now off her back and on her way to being wealthy.  Her music downloads are moving over the internet at maximum price while multi-million dollar contract offers roll in (object lesson...VICE PAYS). 

With the ever faithful Silda by his side, Spitzer apologized for something unmentioned to the electorate while simultaneously trying to plea bargain (with the best lawyers his Daddy’s $500 million can buy) the governorship of New York in exchange for immunity from prosecution for a number of felonies. 

Try that some day.  Try offering a federal prosecutor your bank clerk position in exchange for a free pass on an embezzling charge. 

Even when forced to resign the governorship, the loyal Silda stood silently by his side.  Maybe she was thinking of the non-profit she founded, Children for Children, whose mission is, “...to foster community involvement and social responsibility in young people....” 

All this from a former NY Attorney General who sued a travel agency because “through its actions (it) promotes prostitution and the abuse of young women” and his wife whose passion is supposedly teaching children “responsibility”. 

Another great example for the young people of America...Only take responsibility to the extent that you are forced into it and just keep saying you’re sorry for something never named. 

It’s just a bunch of crap. 

Between the Clintons and the Wall-Spitzers you have four Ivy League law school degrees.  Do you really believe that an Ivy League law school graduate is so naïve and clueless that she can sleep with the same man for 20 years and have no idea that something is horribly wrong? 

Would it be so hard for this “this Harvard-trained lawyer who suspended her high-profile career to raise Spitzer's children and support his political ambitions” to take a stand for the children of this country and condemn the actions of both her husband and “Kristen”? 

For that matter, would it not be something you would have expected from the First Lady who, now, would be president? 

Is it unreasonable to expect “leaders” to do something unselfish in the public good? 

These people might be rich and politically powerful but just under that veneer, they are pathetic weaklings. 

What, besides a pathetic weakling, could have the chance to change history for the better and not get their head out of their pants? 

What am I saying...Fitzgerald has already said it for me... 

Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born rich, it is very difficult to understand. They think, deep in their hearts, that they are better than we are because we had to discover the compensations and refuges of life for ourselves. Even when they enter deep into our world or sink below us, they still think that they are better than we are. They are different.

 



TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; kristen; monicalewinsky; moralabsolutes; spitzer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Why doesn't the MSM ever question how women with Ivy League law degrees can be suddenly so clueless?
1 posted on 03/20/2008 6:27:02 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 03/20/2008 6:30:02 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
This teenage runaway, or whatever she was, is now off her back and on her way to being wealthy.

Considering Dupre got immunity, I'd have to say that isn't bad for an hour's worth of work.

I find it somewhat hilarious that a woman who doesn't posses a college education was able to prosper off the back of (pardon the pun) a supposedly learned man.

3 posted on 03/20/2008 6:35:34 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
Why doesn't the MSM ever question how women with Ivy League law degrees can be suddenly so clueless?

Possibly, because they are all sending their daughters to Ivy law schools?

If they actually have any daughters, that is....

4 posted on 03/20/2008 6:38:38 AM PDT by thulldud (Insanity: Electing John McCain again and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

Because the elite, snotty MSM is, by and large, mostly just like the women with Ivy League law degrees. . clueless.


5 posted on 03/20/2008 6:41:40 AM PDT by Twinkie (TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie
Because the elite, snotty MSM is, by and large, mostly just like the women with Ivy League law degrees. . clueless.

LMAO

6 posted on 03/20/2008 6:45:19 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
This event has taught the young girls a sad lesson:

It is glamorous to be a hooker!

Expect to see more of this.

7 posted on 03/20/2008 6:47:28 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
This event has taught the young girls a sad lesson: It is glamorous to be a hooker! Expect to see more of this.

It will be little different from the Clintons giving teenagers the green light for oral sex.

8 posted on 03/20/2008 6:51:03 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
While channel surfing last night, I happened to see an interview with the guy who owns the nude videos of the hooker Spitzer was with and who has taken back his offer of $1 million for a nude photo shoot. I kept wondering how many girls were envying the hooker, her lifestyle and her vaginal path to power, fame and almost fortune.
9 posted on 03/20/2008 6:53:04 AM PDT by GBA ( God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

Actually, I’ve seen a lot of MSM segments on why the women stand by their cheating men.

I think they do it because it serves them in a practical, material way.


10 posted on 03/20/2008 6:55:16 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
"Actually, I’ve seen a lot of MSM segments on why the women stand by their cheating men. I think they do it because it serves them in a practical, material way."

In some cases, it might be true love and loyalty. One hopes. But in some, it seems to be keeping the material advantage of being married to a rich and powerful jerk.

FTA: "Somehow they serendipitously go from standing by “the children” to standing by their man and all the benefits derived therefrom."

Seems to be a world of whores out there.

I am glad I have my excellent husband, who has nothing but honesty, kindness, strength, responsibility, and character -- not much in the MSM's eyes, but eveything in mine.

11 posted on 03/20/2008 7:00:46 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
it seems to be keeping the material advantage of being married to a rich and powerful jerk.

This goes for the rocket science girls the MSM promotes as "strong", "career driven", "independent".

Well, my mother is all of these without a college degree and she (until her 80's) could still change the oil in her car, repair most of the household appliances, but some morals in her children and...if my Dad ever pulled a Spitzer...get out of the way!!!!!

12 posted on 03/20/2008 7:06:07 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
The real issue is the utter hypocrisy of Silda Wall-Spitzer who has a "charitable" organization to help children become responsible. Yet Wall-Spitzer seemingly had no compunction about supporting her husband who took advantage of a middle-class, messed up runaway.

The hypocrisy of Wall-Sptizer is emblematic of the hypocrisy of the, "it's-for-the-children" Democrats. The Democrats pretend to be about protecting children when in fact the Democrats merely use children as a means to gain power for themselves.

13 posted on 03/20/2008 7:11:33 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

So, instead of paying off my student loans I could have skipped getting my degree and pursuing my dreams altogether and just got loaded by lying on my back spread-eagled? What a great message this sends to young women!! Yes, sarcasm...


14 posted on 03/20/2008 7:11:39 AM PDT by wazoo1031
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
But in some, it seems to be keeping the material advantage of being married to a rich and powerful jerk.

One thing that became clear last week is that Spitzer essentially lives off his father, he doesn't own anything. His wife would not do well at all in a divorce and she knew it. My suspicion is that she has known all about this for years.

15 posted on 03/20/2008 7:18:42 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

“This event has taught the young girls a sad lesson:
It is glamorous to be a hooker!
Expect to see more of this.”

....yep....I first started noticing it in the movie “Pretty Woman”....Julis Roberts is whoring around and wins a rich prince charming played by Richard Gere....the MSM critics just thought it was loads of fun...didn’t say a peep about the 100s of prostitutes found dead in a ditch every year...


16 posted on 03/20/2008 7:21:59 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
I am glad I have my excellent husband, who has nothing but honesty, kindness, strength, responsibility, and character -- not much in the MSM's eyes, but eveything in mine.

Ditto. There's a few out there, and I'm lucky to have one of them. :o)

17 posted on 03/20/2008 7:23:12 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom ("My advice: Quit supporting the party that is symbolized by an ass." Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn
The funny thing is that such arguments rest on the assumption that the great unwashed are more "moral" then the elite.

I haven't seen any studies related to wealth, but there have been several studies done which show that those with higher levels of EDUCATION are less likely to divorce and have a sexually transmitted disease. The highest rates of both, btw, are in the South and southwest.

18 posted on 03/20/2008 7:24:37 AM PDT by Clemenza (I Live in New Jersey for the Same Reason People Slow Down to Look at Car Crashes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
“I find it somewhat hilarious that a woman who doesn't posses a college education was able to prosper off the back of (pardon the pun) a supposedly learned man.”

I have occasionally thought that men who frequent prostitutes are latently homosexual....the urge to insert one's penis in a another man's semen, that is “sloppy” seconds, is not a normal heterosexual act...

19 posted on 03/20/2008 7:26:32 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

Not clueless, calculating.


20 posted on 03/20/2008 7:58:41 AM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson