Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Should Become VP?
The GOPnation.com ^ | March 19, 2008 | The GOPNation.com

Posted on 03/19/2008 11:37:46 AM PDT by bmweezer

The site wants to know your choice - or choices - for VP in the GOP. Now through April 6th, you can vote for as many choices from a list of sixteen 'candidates.' The top eight vote getters move onto the 2nd Round. Vote today!

The sixteen are:

Haley Barbour

Jeb Bush

Tom Coburn

Charlie Crist

Jim DeMint

Mike Huckabee

Kay Bailey Hutchison

Joe Lieberman

Sarah Palin

Tim Pawlenty

Rick Perry

Rob Portman

Colin Powell

Condi Rice

Mitt Romney

JC Watts


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: bmweezer

Hands down - Condi!!


41 posted on 03/19/2008 12:58:05 PM PDT by Lucky9teen ("Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer
Crist - Shallow..Must be ready to be run out of Fla.. the State is in a mess.. also.. too metro sexual.. or gay or what ever...
Jeb Bush - Absolutely!!! - the best qualified candidate for President or VP, but the name needs a bit of a rest
Condi Rice - Excellent, but needs stronger business sense...
Jim DeMint - one of my favorites, should be on the next ticket.. excellent productive worker, high ethics,
Mitt - the solid answer, strong business background, so needed by McCain.. will be great on the global market, can respond to our economic issues placing us back as a major global economic force.. a class act!!!
42 posted on 03/19/2008 1:10:23 PM PDT by Fritzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer
JC Watts!

A solid conservative, who'll help take the race issue off the table.

43 posted on 03/19/2008 1:10:30 PM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

Remember that the Vice-presidency is the only means of taking
the sharp sting out of McCain’s nomination.

So the 2 topmost considerations are:
- winning the election; and
- PRESIDING AS SUCCESSOR-PRESIDENT.

Romney is head-and-shoulders better at both.


44 posted on 03/19/2008 1:31:20 PM PDT by Eleutherios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

McCain......will pick the loser of the Dim fight.


45 posted on 03/19/2008 1:33:00 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is darker than the devil's riding boots.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
..................and the USSC is about to put my mind at rest for that issue, finally.

Don't fall asleep on that point..............

molon labe

46 posted on 03/19/2008 1:34:42 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is darker than the devil's riding boots.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

I am rooting for newt.
Articulates the conservative message better than anyone, and there is sooo much baggage in this election a few affairs and failures is nothing.
Plus, i don’t care who wins.


47 posted on 03/19/2008 1:45:11 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
I’m one of the activists who is sick of Perry’s heavy handed methods.

Likewise. Also, isn't he the fella who showed that he had his finger on the pulse of the GOP grassroots by endorsing Giuliani?

48 posted on 03/19/2008 1:45:50 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Global Warming Heretic -- http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

I like JC Watts.


49 posted on 03/19/2008 1:53:16 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

Sarah Palin

Condi Rice

J.C. Watts


50 posted on 03/19/2008 2:03:32 PM PDT by no dems (Barack Obama's Pastor is nuttier than a squirrel turd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ffusco

It’s not? The Supreme Court says it is a federal issue. How many states are allowed to ban or regulate it now?


51 posted on 03/19/2008 2:04:48 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

Michael Bloomberg
Joe Lieberman
Lincoln Chafee


52 posted on 03/19/2008 2:05:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Point Conceded. It’s a personal issue, so have as many or as few as you like.


53 posted on 03/19/2008 2:08:11 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
Rick Perry is an empty suit, an airhead and a light-weight. The people of Texas, including Republicans have come to despise him. We kept hoping he'd get better; he only got worse. The Trans Texas Corridor put the final nail in his coffin.

Now, bury the LITTLE PUNK!!!

IF YOU WANT TO PUT TEXAS IN THE DEM COLUMN IN NOVEMBER, JUST PUT RICK PERRY ON THE GOP TICKET.
54 posted on 03/19/2008 2:09:43 PM PDT by no dems (Barack Obama's Pastor is nuttier than a squirrel turd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ffusco

Oops, I didn’t read as closely as I should have.


55 posted on 03/19/2008 2:09:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer
Condi

Michael Steele

Barbour

or . . .

Me <- conservative, no skellis in closet, NOT a rino, MK, PK, former Army NCO, loves lots of guns and only one woman, does NOT have great hair, and all-around great guy!

. . . of course most of those qualifications would ensure the GOP didn't want me. haha

56 posted on 03/19/2008 2:21:21 PM PDT by DesertSapper (God, Family, Country . . . . . . . . . . and dead terrorists!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmweezer

It doesn’t matter. McCain will never win the presidency. He is such a loser. Whoever gets the dem nomination will be the next president.


57 posted on 03/19/2008 2:34:18 PM PDT by shaft29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Sanford’s name was first one I looked for.
Amazing that it’s missing, but Joe Lieberman is on it.


58 posted on 03/19/2008 2:44:13 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
I like JC Watts but he would not take votes away from Obama. Blacks have been brain washed too long into voting Democrat.
59 posted on 03/19/2008 2:56:47 PM PDT by kempo (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Carpe Cerevisi
Asked, “Are you pro-life? Are you pro-choice? What is your thought on abortion?”, Rice responded: “I believe if you go back to 2000, when I helped the president in the campaign, I said that I was, in effect, kind of Libertarian on this issue, and meaning by that that I have been concerned about a government role in this issue. I'm a strong proponent of parental choice, of parental notification. I'm a strong proponent of a ban on late-term abortion. These are all things that I think unite people and I think that that's where we should be. I've called myself at times mildly pro-choice.

With little prompting Rice continued, “Yeah, mildly pro-choice. That's what that means. I think that there are a lot of things that we can unite around, and that's where I would tend to be. I'm very comfortable with the president's view that we have to respect and need to have a culture that respects life. This should be an issue pretty infrequently because we ought to have a culture that says that, ‘Who wants to have an abortion? Who wants to see a daughter or a friend or, you know, a sibling go through something like that?’ And so I believe the president has been in exactly the right place about this, which is, we have to respect the culture of life and we have to try and bring people to have respect for it and make this as rare a circumstance as possible.”

When told of the belief that in order to be elected a Republican president, a contender must be firmly pro-life, Rice responded, “I'm not trying to be elected.”

Rice was then pushed on abortion, with Washington Times White House correspondent Bill Sammon saying, “But it sounds like you do not wish to change the laws that now allow (abortion)...”

Rice responded, “Well, I don't spend my entire life thinking about these issues. You know, I spend my time really thinking about the foreign policy issues. But you know that I'm a deeply religious person and so, from my point of view, these extremely difficult moral issues where we have -- where we're facing issues with technology and the prolongation of life and the fact that very, very young babies are able to survive now -- very small babies are able to survive -- these are great moral issues.

What I do think is that we should not have the federal government in a position where it is forcing its views on one side or the other. So, for instance, I've tended to agree with those who do not favor federal funding for abortion, because I believe that those who hold a strong moral view on the other side should not be forced to fund it.”

60 posted on 03/19/2008 3:02:53 PM PDT by rintense (You don't advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. Piss off McCain and Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson