Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHRIS Cox for VP?
The Orange County Register ^ | March 17, 2008 | Robert Novak

Posted on 03/19/2008 9:37:25 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Former conservative colleagues in the House of Representatives are boosting Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission since 2005, to be Sen. John McCain's vice presidential running mate.

A White House aide under President Reagan, Cox served 16 years as a congressman from Newport Beach and was chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee. He was named as a federal appeals court judge to begin President George W. Bush's administration, but withdrew after Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California announced her opposition.

Former Rep. Rob Portman of Ohio, who also was a member of the House leadership before joining the Bush Cabinet, is being promoted for vice president by Washington insiders. But Cox's backers in the House argue that Portman lacks Cox's stature in the conservative movement, which they say McCain needs.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008veep; chriscox; mccain; sec; veep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: Mr. Silverback

yeah but mccain...and certainly the people advising mccain... aren’t that stupid. If mccain wants to win he will have to pick someone that makes sense.

Another reason he won’t pick graham: he’s a senator and 2 senators on the same ticket doesn’t make sense no matter what views you hold.


61 posted on 03/19/2008 11:42:09 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: isrul

a lot of elected republicans in SC don’t like Sanford because he doesn’t get along with them. He vetoes all of their spending bills.
Most conservatives would like Sanford. So having him as VP is a win win.


62 posted on 03/19/2008 11:47:51 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

good point. and if 90% of CA doesn’t know him, 90% of conservatives haven’t heard of him either.

On the other hand, you don’t want a conservative that is too well known such as Newt. You want someone who was properly vetted and re-elected in his own state.


63 posted on 03/19/2008 11:52:51 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
if 90% of CA doesn’t know him, 90% of conservatives haven’t heard of him either.

Conservatives are generally much more informed than the average voter.

64 posted on 03/19/2008 12:09:25 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I'd prefer to support the one who is sane

You have far more faith in John McCain's sanity than I do.


65 posted on 03/19/2008 12:20:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We're surrounded by screeching McPod people." - Don Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Cox


66 posted on 03/19/2008 12:22:05 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
Hunter would be ideal. Cris Cox is also the head lobbyist for the NRA-ILA, very high position in the NRA.
67 posted on 03/19/2008 12:22:10 PM PDT by kimber (Fight for the Right to Bear Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You have far more faith in John McCain's sanity than I do.

Yah, you're willing to put Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama in the driver's seat for four to eight years, and you're questioning my judgment. Tasty pick.

68 posted on 03/19/2008 12:25:14 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Wrong. Unlike you, I’m unwilling to support any of the Democrats, including McCain.


69 posted on 03/19/2008 12:26:54 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We're surrounded by screeching McPod people." - Don Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: isrul
If Cox is a conservative, McCain will not chose him. He's made it clear that he will choose one who shares his beliefs. That precludes the selection of any conservative. Isn't anyone listening to McCain when he says exactly the type of person he will choose?

And I was so sure he was going to pick Graham and have two first ladies.

70 posted on 03/19/2008 12:27:12 PM PDT by E. Cartman (Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Like I said, I’m choosing FDR and you’re choosing Jimmy Carter...and telling yourself a fairy tale about principle.


71 posted on 03/19/2008 12:29:05 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: E. Cartman
And I was so sure he was going to pick Graham and have two first ladies.

Nah, Cindy would get all kinds of jealous.

72 posted on 03/19/2008 12:30:12 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Cox is not the answer.

Dumping John McCain is the answer.

73 posted on 03/19/2008 12:30:36 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Like I said, I’m choosing FDR and you’re choosing Jimmy Carter...and telling yourself a fairy tale about principle.

Wrong. You're choosing the completely corrupted Whigs, who wouldn't know a moral principle if it smacked them in the head, and I'm choosing republicanism and a rebirth of liberty.

74 posted on 03/19/2008 12:33:24 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We're surrounded by screeching McPod people." - Don Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

HE WILL IF HE GETS THE NOMINATION.

But Fat Ugly Moron loser at EIB has convinced the sheeple that beating Obama is essential. Its better to be ruled by Klintons for next 8 years, than accidentally Presidency going to guy with middle name Hussein.

We can’t afford to have Arab middle name in WH.


75 posted on 03/19/2008 12:46:11 PM PDT by The_Republican (Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: surrey

Methinks you have good instincts.


76 posted on 03/19/2008 1:05:20 PM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Different Chris Cox.


77 posted on 03/19/2008 1:06:33 PM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

conservatives may have heard of him based on his policy positions and speeches but he hasn’t been fully vetted and tested as an electable candidate on at least a state-wide level.


78 posted on 03/19/2008 1:09:45 PM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
We can keep going around on this, but the problem with your premise is that you act as if there's no war on.

But hey, look on the bright side: Maybe the imam they assign you will be in favor of tax cuts.

79 posted on 03/19/2008 1:24:16 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Uh...he’s been consistent in his efforts to toughen up the naked short-selling regulations, and taken it on the chin from the funds for being “anti-free market” because of it. Of course, he’s not anti-free market at all. Just anti-fraud in the free market.

Remember, he’s only been there 3 years, and the director can’t issue edicts. He has to get a consensus...and many of the people he has to get to align are people who enacted the flawed quasi-regulations to begin with. Just last week, he finally got the lumbering bureaucracy there to do something about it. The new regulations close loopholes in his predeccor’s toothless regulations and define the practice as fraud.

The only stuff i’ve been able to google up that might have given you the impression he shut down an investigation involves the issuance of subpoenas to members of the press during the overstock.com investigation. Cox recalled the subpoenas because they were issued by the enforcement division without his knowledge or knowledge of the SEC’s general counsel. (Cox was in the hospital having surgery at the time.) He didn’t quash the subpoenas nor shut down the investigation. He put a hold on them. Wisely, I’d say. If you’re going to subpoena members of the press, you better be damn sure your ducks are in a row. He probably wanted to get his IV lines and stitches out before proceeding.


80 posted on 03/19/2008 1:32:10 PM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson