Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
npr ^ | 1/19/2008 | Richard Harris

Posted on 03/19/2008 7:44:52 AM PDT by milwguy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: milwguy

NPR.....another dumbass use of my tax money!


41 posted on 03/19/2008 8:55:55 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

The oceans take a long time to adjust to the surrounding temperature. The oceans are an immense heat/cold storage unit. Since they are so vast, it’s hard to take their temperature. Averaging the temperature readings of a few units at the surface does not produce a useable number.
No conclusion can be draws, in other words.


42 posted on 03/19/2008 9:29:20 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az_gila
After the water droplet effect, we have the ice crystal effect and the water vapor effect as well. I wonder the the aggregate specific heat of the water in the atmosphere is compared to the aggregate specific heat of the surface water (ocean, icepack, lakes, streams and surface groundwater).

One way of having fun with liberals is to ask them to how far down water lines have to be placed in order to protect them from freezing. Around here, in central Missouri, it is about 30 inches. Someone from Alaska told me they bury lines six feet. My next question is to ask just how much energy it takes to freeze the all the surface water, and all the soil down two feet from all of central North America northward. Now consider how much energy it takes in the spring to thaw all that out and compare that to how much energy that humans use. The ratio is many magnitudes. Yet, GlobalLukewarmers asset that humans can somehow swamp that process, so that humans can reduce the average.

I think that human energy usage and human impact on the climate is so slight in comparison to the heatflows from natural process that it falls within the natural ‘noise’ of the system when viewed over time, that is to say on a decade timescale.

43 posted on 03/19/2008 9:30:25 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

To approach it from the viewpoint that we see here,

you have to accept Anthropogenic Global Warming as the baseline Given.

And we’re seeing that - they’re trying to make every observable phenomena fit this Given.


44 posted on 03/19/2008 9:37:41 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Just a(nother) crazy hypothesis ... but anything to help out
the poor hard-left loonies:

since most of the mass of planet Earth is molten,
the “missing heat” is hiding there!


45 posted on 03/19/2008 9:38:45 AM PDT by Eleutherios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Great point. When it comes to sunspots, this solar cycle is one of the deadest we have seen in a long time. How long? I do not know. But I have read of some scientists who are concerned that this could reach the levels of inactivity last seen during the Dalton minimum (the early 1800s). I hope to hell this is not true as a dramatic cool down would be much worse for us in the midwest. A little warm up would actually be damn nice for us in Cold and Gloomy Ohio.


46 posted on 03/19/2008 9:47:12 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
“Kevin Trenberth at the National Center for Atmospheric Research says it's probably going back out into space. The Earth has a number of natural thermostats, including clouds, which can either trap heat and turn up the temperature, or reflect sunlight and help cool the planet.”

It's mind boggling to think of the thousands of characteristics of our planet that must be just right, independently and relatively, to sustain complex life.

47 posted on 03/19/2008 11:27:59 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
No, no, no, you see it can't be the sun. It's the oceans; an extended and colder global El Nina; a cyclical, terrestrial event aka Global Climate ChangeTM. Yeah, that's it. Not a decrease in solar magnetism, not an increase galactic rays and cloud cover, Global Climate ChangeTM foist upon us by the evil (Western) capitalists and their petroleum-based energy sources.
48 posted on 03/20/2008 7:30:31 AM PDT by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Justa

This picture automatically updates each time it’s selected; stay tuned.


49 posted on 03/20/2008 7:33:41 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson