Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen said: "Only adult, white, male citizens were protected by the fourth amendment back then."

Then it should be pretty easy for you to prove. Such proof should also include a citation of the case which reversed the exclusion of women such that they are now protected.

110 posted on 03/21/2008 4:48:02 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
"Such proof should also include a citation of the case which reversed the exclusion of women such that they are now protected."

The DC Circuit Court in US v Parker stated:

"This proposition is true even though “the people” at the time of the founding was not as inclusive a concept as “the people” today. To the extent that non-whites, women, and the propertyless were excluded from the protections afforded to “the people” ...

That's all I need to prove my point.

111 posted on 03/21/2008 5:03:24 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson