Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Tell
"Such proof should also include a citation of the case which reversed the exclusion of women such that they are now protected."

The DC Circuit Court in US v Parker stated:

"This proposition is true even though “the people” at the time of the founding was not as inclusive a concept as “the people” today. To the extent that non-whites, women, and the propertyless were excluded from the protections afforded to “the people” ...

That's all I need to prove my point.

111 posted on 03/21/2008 5:03:24 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen said: "That's all I need to prove my point."

The quote you supplied refers to the "extent" but does not describe the extent, nor does it prove that the Fourth Amendment was ever held to not apply to woman living alone.

It's no wonder you say so many ridiculous things if that is typical of your reasoning skills.

112 posted on 03/21/2008 6:19:24 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson