Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
Last time: If the Founders meant eveyone, the used the phrase "all persons".

"The people", the whole people" "the people at large", "freemen" and "freeholders" all referred to something else.

You can't make up your own definitions to suit your argument. Well, not with me you can't.

102 posted on 03/20/2008 1:46:07 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Last time: If the Founders meant eveyone, the used the phrase "all persons".

"The people", the whole people" "the people at large", "freemen" and "freeholders" all referred to something else.

Evidence for this claim?

103 posted on 03/20/2008 3:30:31 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen said: Last time: If the Founders meant eveyone, the used the phrase "all persons".

Amendment 4:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, ..."

Obviously, this means that only males between the ages of 17 and 45 are protected.

108 posted on 03/21/2008 11:57:19 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson