“The answer to your question lies in the fact that preconditions to Kyoto are meaningless.”
This statement makes no sense. How can preconditions to international legislation be meaningless? If China and India are not participants, neither is the U.S. Your prediction that McCain will sign it regardless is contradictory to McCain’s statement. Do you have any evidence that he will sign on regardless of these preconditions? Unless you have a source that shows he will do as you say, I don’t see your prediction as having any substance.
Please re-read post 100.
Pre-conditions are meaningless and I clearly explain why.
As for my prediction about McCain, I have clearly told you that he already believes in global warming, an, coupled with his proven propensity to go with the Democratic agenda evidenced in his sponsorship of Dem legislation, is the best indicator of his future actions.
If his so-called pre-conditions are not met, he will not be able to resist committing America to Kyoto in the face of multilevel calls for him to provide”leadership” in the matter, even if China and India prove recalcitrant.
Past actions are the best indicator of future actions.
Any other questions?
“Your prediction that McCain will sign it regardless is contradictory to McCain’s statement. Do you have any evidence that he will sign on regardless of these preconditions? Unless you have a source that shows he will do as you say, I don’t see your prediction as having any substance.”
His record is enough to prove he will go along with Democrats at every turn. YOU on the other hand have no proof he would actually stand up to them on any principle. And that goes for any issue, not just this silly global warming crap.