Please re-read post 100.
Pre-conditions are meaningless and I clearly explain why.
As for my prediction about McCain, I have clearly told you that he already believes in global warming, an, coupled with his proven propensity to go with the Democratic agenda evidenced in his sponsorship of Dem legislation, is the best indicator of his future actions.
If his so-called pre-conditions are not met, he will not be able to resist committing America to Kyoto in the face of multilevel calls for him to provide”leadership” in the matter, even if China and India prove recalcitrant.
Past actions are the best indicator of future actions.
Any other questions?
“If his so-called pre-conditions are not met, he will not be able to resist committing America to Kyoto in the face of multilevel calls for him to provide”leadership” in the matter, even if China and India prove recalcitrant.”
You still have not provided any evidence of this. If you can find a quote by McCain or a staffer, saying he has changed his stance and will join Kyoto without the preconditions he had previously insisted on, by all means provide it. Otherwise, it seems as though it is baseless speculation on your part.
“his sponsorship of Dem legislation, is the best indicator of his future actions.”
If this were true, he’d have jumped ship on Iraq with the congressional democrats.
“Any other questions?”
Yes, what was McCain’s stance on the surge in comparison with the stance of Barrak/Hillary? (Yeah, I already know, but I like to ask you anti-McCain people questions in which you have to acknowledge stark differences between the canidates).
;-)