To: 45Auto
(1) is protected. (2) is not.
To: robertpaulsen
Historical writings on the subject by the guys who wrote the B of R suggests that arms in the hands of the citizenry are protected. I guess we’ll find out by midyear. God help the SOB who has to go around and collect those items should this court act in a collectively stupid manner.
45 posted on
03/17/2008 5:45:04 PM PDT by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: robertpaulsen
49 posted on
03/17/2008 5:52:05 PM PDT by
Eaker
(If illegal immigrants were so great for an economy; Mexico would be building a wall to keep them in)
To: robertpaulsen; 45Auto
64 posted on
03/17/2008 9:21:12 PM PDT by
Ancesthntr
(An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
To: robertpaulsen
(1) is protected. (2) is not. Maybe you should have listened to the Supreme Court hearing today. You're wrong and about 8 Justices are about ready to rule on it.
130 posted on
03/18/2008 12:44:37 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(su - | echo "All your " | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r | echo "belong to us")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson