Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Triple
"But why isn’t it perfectly plausible, indeed reasonable, to assume that since the framers knew that the way militias were destroyed by tyrants in the past was not by passing a law against militias, but by taking away the people’s weapons — that was the way militias were destroyed.”

I agree. The second amendment was written to protect the right to keep and bear arms of those individuals who ARE part of a well regulated Militia from federal infringement. The Militia remains intact.

184 posted on 03/19/2008 9:35:35 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

Wow - You previously claimed that the second amendment protected a “State Militia.”

Further - Scalia supports the view that individuals outside the militia have a right to arms “the people’s weapons” - something you also contested.

Your inconsistency and mental gymnastics are amusing.


188 posted on 03/19/2008 10:56:53 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson