Wow - You previously claimed that the second amendment protected a “State Militia.”
Further - Scalia supports the view that individuals outside the militia have a right to arms “the people’s weapons” - something you also contested.
Your inconsistency and mental gymnastics are amusing.
Never. I have said that the "well regulated Militia" of the second amendment referred to a state Militia.
"Scalia supports the view that individuals outside the militia have a right to arms “the people’s weapons” - something you also contested."
Scalia didn't say "individuals outside the militia". He was referring to members of a milita -- that the way militias were destroyed was not by passing laws against them but by disarming those who formed the militia.