Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Potter Author JK Rowling Equates Christians Who Avoid Potter with Islamic Fundamentalists
Life Site News ^ | 3-12-08 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 03/17/2008 7:44:22 AM PDT by Terriergal

Potter Author JK Rowling Equates Christians Who Avoid Potter with Islamic Fundamentalists

Says "fundamentalists across all the major religions, if you put them in a room, they'd have bags in common! They hate all the same things"

By John-Henry Westen

J.K. RowlingEDINBURGH, March 12, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The newly released edition of the Edinburgh University Student newspaper, the oldest student newspaper in the UK, includes an interview with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling.  In the interview Rowling claims to have received death threats from Christians opposed to her novels, calling Christian 'fundamentalists' "dangerous" and comparing them by inference to Islamic fundamentalists.


Asked if there were not some Christians who dislike the book 'intensely', Rowling replied, "Oh, vehemently and they send death threats."  Questioned about the 'death threats', she added, "Once, yeah.  Well, more than once.  It is comical in retrospect.  I was in America, and there was a threat made against a bookstore that I was appearing at, so we had the police there." 

While she said she could stomach critics, she had little time for Christian criticism.  "But to be honest the Christian Fundamentalist thing was bad," she said.  "I would have been quite happy to sit there and debate with one of the critics who were taking on Harry Potter from a moral perspective."


Many Christians who have opposed the Potter series have done so after reading comments by Christian reviewers pointing out their moral and spiritual dangers.  The opponents, who have been relying on the reviewers criticisms, have often avoided reading Rowling's lengthy Potter narratives, and Rowling uses such cases to paint Christians as if they were insane.

"I've tried to be rational about it," she told the paper.  "There's a woman in North Carolina or Alabama who's been trying to get the books banned-she's a mother of four and never read them. And then- I'm not lying, I'm not even making fun, this is the truth of what she said-quite recently she was asked [why] and she said 'Well I prayed whether or not I should read them, and God told me no.'"

The interviewer notes that at that point "Rowling pauses to reflect on the weight of that statement, and her expression one of utter disbelief."  Rowling then continued, "You see, that is where I absolutely part company with people on that side of the fence, because that is fundamentalism. Fundamentalism is, 'I will not open my mind to look on your side of the argument at all. I won't read it, I won't look at it, I'm too frightened.'"

"That's what's dangerous about it, whether it be politically extreme, religiously extreme...In fact, fundamentalists across all the major religions, if you put them in a room, they'd have bags in common! They hate all the same things, it's such an ironic thing." 


Michael O'Brien Michael O'Brien, one of the most prominent Potter critics, has carefully read and analyzed the Potter books critiquing the spiritual and moral problems with Rowling's works.  O'Brien commented to LifeSiteNews.com about Rowling's mockery of Christians who avoid her works.

"Regrettably, there is a strange new form of self-righteousness at work in the world-a psychological state of mind that is common to post-modernists such as J. K. Rowling," said O'Brien. "One of its symptoms is their inability to discuss on a serious level the truth or untruth of their cultural products. They avoid the real issues and instead take the 'ad hominem' approach-personal attacks against those who raise critical objections to the disorders in their books.  From the vaccuum of real thought arises the dreary habit of classifying as a 'fundamentalist' any critic who bases his arguments on religious or spiritual grounds."

Added O'Brien: "This term is used against bomb-throwing terrorists, sweet grandmothers praying silently before abortuaries, and anyone who preaches the fullness of the Christian faith in church and media. It has become the utmost smear word, a weapon that is proving quite effective in silencing opposition. If you don't have an argument yourself, you just switch tactics and cry 'fundamentalist!' Supposedly all opposition will then collapse."

In previous interviews Rowling has said Christian criticism of her works come from the "lunatic fringe" of the church.


Prior to being elected Pope, then-Cardinal Ratzinger expressed an opinion opposing the Potter books.  He sent a letter of gratitude to Gabriele Kuby who authored a work explaining the dangers of the Potter story, especially to young children.  Made available by LifeSiteNews.com, Ratzinger's letter to Ms. Kuby stated, "It is good, that you enlighten people about Harry Potter, because those are subtle seductions, which act unnoticed and by this deeply distort Christianity in the soul, before it can grow properly." 

Father Gabriele Amorth, chief exorcist of the Vatican also condemned the books warning parents, "Behind Harry Potter hides the signature of the king of the darkness, the devil." Father Amorth criticized the novels for glorifying magic, which he explicitly refers to as "the satanic art", and for presenting disordered perceptions of morality in the supposedly heroic main characters.

See related LifeSiteNews coverage:

Pope Opposes Harry Potter Novels - Signed Letters from Cardinal Ratzinger Now Online

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/jul/05071301.html

Harry Potter Feature Page:
http://www.lifesite.net/features/harrypotter/

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/mar/08031204.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: christian; culturewars; fundamentalist; harrypotter; novels; potter; rowling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-432 next last
To: Tax-chick

I think JR Ward is fabulous (if you’re into dark stuff) and I’m on a Loretta Chase “read all her stuff jag” as well as Nalini Singh.


161 posted on 03/17/2008 9:19:56 AM PDT by najida (My nephew Ethan is here! Another baby to spoil and then hand back :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I don't want to get into a debate either, but I didn't say they were two sides of the same coin. I said there were two sources of supernatural power.

An example - the magicians of Egypt were able to perform some signs in answer to the miracles God did through Moses, i.e., the serpents.

162 posted on 03/17/2008 9:20:09 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

I am a Christian and I equate her work with Satan.


163 posted on 03/17/2008 9:22:09 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine

Yes, but one side is there for the right reasons. One got there because of wrong reasons. It is just coincidence that the result is that both are opposed to the same thing.

That’s like saying the kid who gets the math problem right because he works out the problem correctly is the same as the kid who does incorrect math but accidentally (and coincidentally) writes down the correct answer.

Nice try, but it’s a specious argument.


164 posted on 03/17/2008 9:22:37 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ConfusedAndLovingIt

It wasn’t a joke, and I’ve read the entire series. If you think I’m missing something, please enlighten me.


165 posted on 03/17/2008 9:23:09 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
For believers who follow the scriptural dictates against witchcraft these are black and white issues and there's no question which path to take.

Do you advocate that witches be put to death?

Exod.22 [18] "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."

166 posted on 03/17/2008 9:24:14 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

This is “fantasy”. In the Harry Potter world, magic is a talent one is born with. It has no source. It’s like another branch of science or a technology.


167 posted on 03/17/2008 9:25:21 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Vote for The Huckster 2012- Who needs White House furniture, anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Yo have quite a vivid imagination...and it’s a little disturbing.


168 posted on 03/17/2008 9:29:07 AM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
...exactly right.

I like to say that even a blind bird can find a worm.

169 posted on 03/17/2008 9:30:04 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: meandog
The thing that makes a "classic" is continuing popularity, that is, a book that speaks to more than one generation or culture is more likely to be "classic" material, because it works at a deeper level than the swiftly changing surface culture that first spawned it.

So far, Tolkien's work has held up for 50-plus years, so it may well attain "classic" status in the long run. This might be because he was a master storyteller, as well a much better wordsmith than Rowling is. His works have depths which reach back into his extensive knowledge of Norse and Teutonic mythology, Christian theology, and European languages.

Whether Rowling's output has the sort of richness that Tolkien's evidently has is up for question. I certainly have not seen it. As to Harry Potter becoming a classic, well, for that it's too soon to tell.

170 posted on 03/17/2008 9:30:30 AM PDT by thulldud (Insanity: Electing John McCain again and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

That is really a sick outlook.

I guess all fathers who love their sons, or uncles who love their nephews are gay. Any teacher who loves his students is suspect, as well.

And any teenage boy who spends any time with another male in an enclosed space is gay.

My husband and son will love that. I guess I should worry when my son is locked in his room watching war movies or playing war games with his friends.

Does this go for girls, too?

I had better put an end to all those nail polish/hairdo parties my daughter has.

“NO more friends, children!!”


171 posted on 03/17/2008 9:30:35 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Vote for The Huckster 2012- Who needs White House furniture, anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I’m not the one who proclaimed that Dumbledore was homosexual. She was. Is that part of my vivid imagination?


172 posted on 03/17/2008 9:31:16 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
I am a Christian and I equate her work with Satan.

Interesting. What do you make of white witchcraft, as in Lord of the Rings or Narnia?

173 posted on 03/17/2008 9:32:33 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

How old are your children?


174 posted on 03/17/2008 9:33:26 AM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

“Rowling taking cues from another popular author:”

Who’s that?


175 posted on 03/17/2008 9:33:32 AM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

Just curious, other than the Bible itself, is there anything on earth that you don’t equate with Satan?


176 posted on 03/17/2008 9:35:48 AM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: JenB

um... well I guess if someone calls in a death threat you can assume it’s representative of all Christian fundamentalists then?

Rick Warren said the very same thing about Christian Fundamentalists, being one of the big ‘enemies’ of the 21st century along with Islamic Fundamentalism.

Sorry, not buying it.

But I have talked to many Christians who have read the books and seen NOTHING of the gospel in them. They may be entertaining books but they are just as gospel-void as the Purpose Driven Life.


177 posted on 03/17/2008 9:35:58 AM PDT by Terriergal ("I am ashamed that women are so simple To offer war where they should kneel for peace," Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Can you please provide links to where some Christians have actually tried to prevent others from reading these books? I'm not aware of such situations. (Note: Merely expressing an opinion about them isn't preventing anyone from reading the book.)

I have so much to do today, but I found this in under 30 seconds:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15127464/

In the case I cite above, this mother asked that the books be banned from public schools because they are "evil" and "promote witchcraft". If you do a search for her name, she is clearly doing so for religious reasons.

The ALA says that the Harry Potter books are the 7th most challenged books in libraries: http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/bannedbooksweek/bbwlinks/100mostfrequently.htm

I read three books and didn't like them, so I can speak about them as someone who is familiar with them. I will say that all of the people in the news that I have read about who have tried to ban the book have been Christian and have reportedly tried to do so because the books offended their religion.

As a Christian, my faith is not so weak that a book could change it, and it is disturbing whenever I see people like the woman mentioned above - if she doesn't want to read it or allow her kids to read it, fine. But she and others have tried to ban it and keep it out of the hands of other people.

Which is exactly the tact that Islamic fundamentalists take. I can't handle this, so you can't, either. It's wrong, no matter who does it.

178 posted on 03/17/2008 9:37:12 AM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg; Cyrano

I started reading the first one and got about four pages in and it really creeped me out already by then. Cyrano has read at least a few of them. They are well written I agree, which is why the creepiness of the first few pages of the first one got to me.

I’m sorry, I just don’t get the fascination with morbidity that came across there, especially from Christians.


179 posted on 03/17/2008 9:38:11 AM PDT by Terriergal ("I am ashamed that women are so simple To offer war where they should kneel for peace," Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

lol


180 posted on 03/17/2008 9:38:31 AM PDT by Terriergal ("I am ashamed that women are so simple To offer war where they should kneel for peace," Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-432 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson