Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
No, they did not. They determined that a well regulated Miltia was necessary to the security of a free state. Not an armed populace.

Every other amendment to the Constitution concerns individual rights and when your argument is posited the courts have interrupted it in favor of the individual.

We shall see.

19 posted on 03/16/2008 3:26:35 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Recon Dad
Every other amendment to the Constitution concerns individual rights and when your argument is posited the courts have interrupted it in favor of the individual.

You nailed it. Protecting the rights of the 'individual' is what the US Constitution is all about.

21 posted on 03/16/2008 3:28:59 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson