Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Self-hating Spitzer--Why do men who seem to have everything throw it all away?
Jerusalem Post ^ | 3-16-08 | SHMULEY BOTEACH

Posted on 03/16/2008 12:41:03 PM PDT by SJackson

Dr. Laura Schlesinger has a penchant for inane and knee-jerk moralizing. But last week even she outdid herself, as she blamed Elliot Spitzer's long-suffering wife, Silda, for her husband's unfaithfulness with a prostitute.

Speaking on the Today show, Dr. Laura opined: "When the wife does not focus in on the needs and the feelings sexually, personally, to make him feel like a man, to make him feel like a success, to make him feel like our hero, he's very susceptible to the charm of some other woman making him feel what he needs. These days, women don't spend a lot of time thinking about how they can give their men what they need."

According to Dr. Laura's approach, these poor, neglected husbands have been pushed by their rebellious wives into being porn and sex addicts. How sad that in the wake of the Elliot Spitzer tragedy we get Dr. Laura's blame-the-victim drivel rather than an honest discussion on the downfall of the American Male.

Men today are cheating not because their wives do not love them, but because they do not love themselves; not because their wives are not caring, but because their perforated sense of self is immune to affection. Were their wives to shower them with all the love in the world, it would simply seep through the shards of their shattered egos.

Propelled to succeed by an all-encompassing fear of failure and thrown into a rat race without limit, the broken American male never feels like he is ever good enough and chooses destructive escapes to compensate.

Powerful men like Spitzer are especially susceptible to the irrational self-loathing that is increasingly affecting the American male. Whatever level of achievement he attains, it is never enough to quiet the inner demons that tell him he is worthless. A culture built on soulless success has raised a generation of men to believe they are anonymous unless they accumulate money or fame, with women being yet another prized possession that accrues to the alpha male.

TRAINED TO feel like they are important only through professional achievement, these men are clueless about being in a relationship. They know how to master rather than relate, how to conquer rather than open up, how to manipulate rather than connect.

For the man to whom power is an aphrodisiac, paying a woman for sex becomes an erotic thrill. And men with low self-esteem are profoundly susceptible to women who are not their wives.

The man who sees himself as a loser sees the woman dumb enough to marry him as a loser squared. His wife's affection, therefore, cannot make him feel like a winner. It is only the woman to whom he is not married, the one that has not been devalued through a merger with a failure, that can make him feel consequential. And a woman who is so desirable that a night with her can set you back thousands of dollars can make a guy feel like a million bucks.

Bill Clinton may have been the most powerful man in the world. But all that power could not inflate an ego so punctured that it sought significance in a liaison with an all-too-ordinary intern who understood the depth of his need to feel good about himself.

LAST WEEK in Los Angeles I debated my dear friend Dennis Prager, the brilliant radio host and public intellectual, on whether men or women are more responsible for the breakdown of the American family. I argued that broken men are undermining their families; Dennis claimed that the blame was equally shared.

Now Dennis has always been a mentor to me. But, come on! You have to be blind not to see that men are in crisis. They are three times more likely to cheat on a spouse, eight times more likely to abandon their children (how often do you hear of a dead-beat Mom?), commit 98 percent of all violent crimes, and stand a decent chance of becoming porn addicts.

Even if they overcome the porn, they usually end up sports and TV addicts, who spend, on average, three hours per day in front of the tube. And that's three hours where they are not helping with the dishes, putting the kids to sleep, or being with their wives.

Sex for men has become a game of mastery rather than intimacy. A shocking statistic from the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, published providentially on the same day of the outbreak of the Spitzer scandal, showed that one in four female American teens has an STD. Millions of teenage boys are pushing girls to have sex well before their bodies are ready, and without any kind of protection. Sexual scandals among powerful men should likewise spur us to action.

THE SOLUTION is to set a new definition of success among American men that is dependent not on becoming the competent governor of a state, but on becoming the responsible head of a household. The great man is not only he who can balance state budgets but he who helps his children with their algebra. Not he who hits home runs, but he who runs home to be with his family. Not he who wins primaries, but he who makes his wife and his children primary.

In this political season, it is in vogue to believe that pulling a lever for a particular candidate will bring us the change we desire. But it is we who have to change. America is not wanting in talented senators and industrious politicians. Rather, it is wanting in loving husbands and devoted fathers.

In the final analysis, what the people of New York think of Elliot Spitzer is not nearly as important as what his wife and children think of him. Because you are not a success in life if the people who mean the most to you think the least of you.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: boteach; drlaura; psychology; rabbishmuley; rabbishmuleyboteach; shmuleyboteach; spitzer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: 9YearLurker

Now we have the Meange a Trois story of Dina and Jim McGreevey and their driver Ted something!!!!


81 posted on 03/17/2008 6:26:36 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

I believe she was devastated. You don’t know here so quit the judging. That was no act. I know, I’ve been there, done that.
________________________________________________________
Just like Mrs. McGreavey was devastated?

You don’t know either. That’s my point. At this point, all you do is “believe.” It would be easy enough for me to say that I don’t believe that a husband would be whoring around for 10 years and his wife wouldn’t know about it, wouldn’t have made her peace with it, long ago.

Be careful about investing your own emotions in a political wife. That’s what many of them are, political.


82 posted on 03/18/2008 4:53:05 PM PDT by CZB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Men who throw it all away are really pathetic dumbasses who didn’t value what they had in the first place.

Easy to figure out.


83 posted on 03/18/2008 4:55:18 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CZB

I can’t judge how Mrs. McGreavey felt. None of us can really know how these women felt. They loved their husbands, that may have been their only ‘crime.’


84 posted on 03/18/2008 8:56:05 PM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CZB
Thank you.

Dr. Laura has said she was not talking about the Spitzers because she does not know them, knows nothing about them or their marriage, and that the media decided FOR RATINGS PURPOSES to connect her comments to the Spitzer marriage.

85 posted on 03/18/2008 9:00:14 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

O.K. I don’t want to beat this to death. Whatever you experienced, I’m sorry you had to go through it. There’s nothing good about infidelity. My experience was 20+ years working in political Washington and I have a low “trust quotient” for liberal politicians, even their wives. For me, they are all pretty much guilty until they prove themselves innocent. And they almost never do. Alternatively, I’ve always admired Dr. Laura. My instinct is to defend Dr. Laura, yours is to defend Mrs. Spitzer. Neither is a crime.


86 posted on 03/19/2008 4:29:09 PM PDT by CZB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Right. As a practicing medical professional, Dr. Laura can’t address specific remarks to people she’s never even met or spoken to. The idiots in the media, on the other hand, operate by no such codes and just bend everything to fit their agenda and story-line. It explains why they cannot EVER get anything correct about medicine or religion or any activity that might have ethics built into its fabric.


87 posted on 03/19/2008 4:32:43 PM PDT by CZB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CZB

I like Dr. Laura, too. She tells it like it is. Her past is of no concern to me if she’s repented and made a good life for herself, which I believe she has. I can understand your viewpoint as well.


88 posted on 03/19/2008 5:14:48 PM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson