Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spanalot

The decision, as you have noted in your post, was beyond Eisenhower’s. It was Roosevelt’s. Calling Eisenhower a traitor indicates a severe ignorance of American history and is a slander on a good soldier.


14 posted on 03/16/2008 11:36:41 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: GAB-1955

“Calling Eisenhower a traitor indicates a severe ignorance of American history and is a slander on a good soldier.”

Do you deny he held back Patton? Do you deny he was behind sending Pattons supplies to Monty for that disaster in Market Garden?

You have been reading the NY Times too much.


18 posted on 03/16/2008 11:43:02 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: GAB-1955

Either way....I didn’t read the whole post...it wasn’t treason, it was an attempt by one honest side to make the best of a bad situation with a temporary otherwise bent on world domination just like Hitler.


27 posted on 03/16/2008 12:00:06 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama looks, walks and talks like a racist pig...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson