Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer tax repeal eyed (MD)
The Washington Times ^ | 3-14-08 | Brian Witte

Posted on 03/14/2008 11:19:19 AM PDT by JZelle

DUNDALK, Md. (AP) — Gov. Martin O'Malley said yesterday he would support repealing a tax on computer services if an alternative is found, because he now thinks the tax could have repercussions on Maryland's economy.

Instead, Mr. O'Malley said he supports a higher income tax on the very wealthy, which is closer to what he originally proposed during November's special legislative session to tackle the state's $1.7 billion structural deficit.

"I've never been a big fan of the computer tax, and the more we look at it and the more we look at the potential downsides of the computer tax, the more convinced I become that we should look for some alternative," Mr. O'Malley said.

While Mr. O'Malley has left the door open for a possible repeal before, his comments yesterday reflected a much stronger interest in moving away from the tax.

But that understanding hasn't emerged for the better in the minds of business owners, who are threatening to flee the state.

Mr. O'Malley yesterday distanced himself from the tax altogether, emphasizing several times it was not his idea and that the tax came "out of left field."

The governor said lawmakers "did not have the political will" to go along with his plan for a higher income tax rate on the wealthy. Mr. O'Malley, a Democrat, said lawmakers decided on the computer tax, "which had not been as fully vetted and considered as it might have been."

One way that appears closest to Mr. O'Malley's preference is a measure that would create new income tax rates of 6 percent for people with incomes between $750,000 and $1 million a year and a new rate of 6.5 percent for people who make more than $1 million.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: computertax; omalley; tax
They say Bush is dumb!
1 posted on 03/14/2008 11:19:21 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

First O’Malley pushes through the tax. Then while the State is collecting it he says he doesn’t like it. What a hypocrite.


2 posted on 03/14/2008 11:23:35 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
I guess he wants to figure out how to raise taxes without killing the goose. O'Malley is really dumb.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 03/14/2008 11:27:09 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The funny part is that because Maryland is one of the "richest" states, just about anyone here who earns any income from a real job will always be "rich" and pay more taxes under any plan that hits "only the rich."

On another angle, this is one of the smallest states in the Union with respect to geography. It would be trivially easy for business to pack up and move to surrounding states to escape any new tax.

4 posted on 03/14/2008 11:30:43 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
They say Bush is dumb!

O'Malley is actually quite the capable politician. He has managed to become less popular than Bush in one of the bluest states.

5 posted on 03/14/2008 11:32:06 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

I know Delaware gets a lot of Maryland’s corporate refugees.


6 posted on 03/14/2008 11:34:10 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Not to mention the many who can shop in Delaware, especially for big ticket items, to avoid Maryland’s sales tax.


7 posted on 03/14/2008 11:38:20 AM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Can someone explain what this tax IS..?


8 posted on 03/14/2008 11:40:28 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

http://www.informationweek.com/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=203103232


9 posted on 03/14/2008 11:45:49 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Why don’t they just tax politicians and state workers at 50%? That should make up for any losses.


10 posted on 03/14/2008 12:37:37 PM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

RE : “First O’Malley pushes through the tax.”

MoM was pushing the service tax on services and health clubs but those businesses lobbied to get rid of those so the general assembly snuck in the computer tax because those businesses were not expecting it and had no say. MoM was going to sign any tax that allowed him to reward his buddies with spending for getting him elected.

This is the site to keep up on this:

http://omalleywatch.com/


11 posted on 03/14/2008 1:17:30 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

This sounds like what Granholm and the legislature did in Michigan.

We’ve got a 6% sales tax but no tax on labor and services. In order to fix a huge deficit they extended the 6% tax to include some services that would bring in $600 mil. The problem? It would cost businesses $900 mil to collect them! And the spread wasn’t fair at all - golf courses weren’t taxed but ski lifts were. The outrage was so bad that businesses *begged* for a surcharge! The service tax law was rescinded and now they pay a 22% surcharge.

This could be the latest in democrat tax policies — pass taxes that are so onerous that people will scream for one that stinks just a little less.


12 posted on 03/14/2008 1:24:51 PM PDT by Kieri (Midwest Snark Claw & Feather Club Founder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

Enter Martin O’Malley, Destructor of Maryland!

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


13 posted on 03/14/2008 5:13:00 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Thanks for the info. I just remember O’Malley pushing hard for many tax increases(income tax, sales tax, others). I wish Ehrlich had really hammered home O’Malley’s propensity to raise taxes in the election. He might have won and we wouldn’t be facing these taxes and deficits. Plus, I can’t believe O’Malley is being honest when he says he wants to repeal any tax. O’Malley never met a tax he didn’t like.


14 posted on 03/15/2008 6:15:13 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Can someone explain what this tax IS..?

It is a sales and use tax on computer services. See http://www.marylandtaxes.com/special_session/sut_computerservices.asp for links to draft regulations and FAQ.

15 posted on 03/17/2008 4:53:52 AM PDT by foxfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson