Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So why does the House need privacy unless they have something to hide?
1 posted on 03/13/2008 9:40:25 PM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: traviskicks

ping


2 posted on 03/13/2008 9:41:13 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

I’m sure the “leak-proof” congress will keep all of this secret from the public. LOL!


3 posted on 03/13/2008 9:42:26 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

Wait a second. They had the place swept so no one could eavesdrop on their discussion of eavesdropping? Too funny.


4 posted on 03/13/2008 9:44:20 PM PDT by ozaukeemom (Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

The way W responded to it, he looked like he had given up. Just lowering his gaze, trying to be assertive, but still looking meek.


7 posted on 03/13/2008 10:19:36 PM PDT by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

It’s about time Congress didn’t debate national security tools in front of the world.


11 posted on 03/13/2008 11:14:04 PM PDT by skr (How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

Exactly. People with integrity and are moral don’t have to hide anything.


13 posted on 03/14/2008 12:02:04 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

Before we begin this newsconference, I want to call
your attention to the hard copy of the report we
prepared for the media and have just handed out.





16 posted on 03/14/2008 3:08:02 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

We’re going to get royally screwed.


22 posted on 03/14/2008 4:03:09 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

Is this the transparency in government the deomcrats have been promising?


24 posted on 03/14/2008 5:57:26 AM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
House Democratic leaders agreed Thursday to a rare closed-door session — the first in 25 years

I'm confused. I thought the democrats just did this a couple of years ago?

25 posted on 03/14/2008 6:27:16 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

In this case, the REPUBLICANS are asking for this, and the democrats didn’t want to do it but they have no real choice.

The Democrats are afraid that the Republicans will bring up classified information that will then make it impossible for the democrats to make their pretty speeches in open session because they will have heard the classified information.


26 posted on 03/14/2008 6:32:45 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

What goes on in the house stays in the house. Right?


30 posted on 03/14/2008 7:22:04 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
Duplicate, already posted here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1985667/posts

35 posted on 03/14/2008 11:22:12 AM PDT by Kaslin (Peace is the aftermath of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

I hope you were being sarcastic. The evidence that is going to be presented would compromise ongoing surveillance operations.


36 posted on 03/14/2008 1:23:10 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

So much for Peloski’s “transparency” in govt.


45 posted on 03/17/2008 4:18:23 PM PDT by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson