Skip to comments.
House to close its doors for spying bill
AP via Yahoo ^
| March 13, 2008
Posted on 03/13/2008 9:40:24 PM PDT by gondramB
WASHINGTON - House Democratic leaders agreed Thursday to a rare closed-door session the first in 25 years to debate surveillance legislation.
Republicans requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping bill that is opposed by the White House and most Republicans in Congress.
The closed-door debate was scheduled for late Thursday night, after the House chamber could be cleared and swept by security personnel to make sure there are no listening devices.
The last private session in the House was in 1983 on U.S. support for paramilitary operations in Nicaragua. Only five closed sessions have taken place in the House since 1825.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; calea; carnivore; privacy; veto; wiretapping; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
So why does the House need privacy unless they have something to hide?
1
posted on
03/13/2008 9:40:25 PM PDT
by
gondramB
To: traviskicks
2
posted on
03/13/2008 9:41:13 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: gondramB
I’m sure the “leak-proof” congress will keep all of this secret from the public. LOL!
3
posted on
03/13/2008 9:42:26 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
To: gondramB
Wait a second. They had the place swept so no one could eavesdrop on their discussion of eavesdropping? Too funny.
4
posted on
03/13/2008 9:44:20 PM PDT
by
ozaukeemom
(Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights)
To: ozaukeemom
I meant to say ironic. Ooops
5
posted on
03/13/2008 9:45:01 PM PDT
by
ozaukeemom
(Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights)
To: ozaukeemom
Wait a second. They had the place swept so no one could eavesdrop on their discussion of eavesdropping?
6
posted on
03/13/2008 9:52:44 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: gondramB
The way W responded to it, he looked like he had given up. Just lowering his gaze, trying to be assertive, but still looking meek.
7
posted on
03/13/2008 10:19:36 PM PDT
by
The_Republican
(You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
To: The_Republican
He’s acting like a typical short-timer. Makes me sad.
8
posted on
03/13/2008 10:33:08 PM PDT
by
Just Lori
(There is nothing democrat-"ic" about democrats.)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
our government is populated by silver spoon morons with ivory tower attitudes, inept, self serving, short sighted, greedy, ignorant, complacent and pudgy weaklings.
at the rate things are going I wouldn't be surprised if the house of cards folds up soon
9
posted on
03/13/2008 10:38:35 PM PDT
by
KTM rider
(McCain '08, ...plan B is better than no plan at all)
The closed-door debate was scheduled for late Thursday night, after the House chamber could be cleared and swept by security personnel to make sure there are no listening devices.
If memory serves me correctly after the last closed-door session we got the Iran-Contra Affair.
To: gondramB
It’s about time Congress didn’t debate national security tools in front of the world.
11
posted on
03/13/2008 11:14:04 PM PDT
by
skr
(How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
To: skr
I do understand the actual need. I just found the situation ironic.
12
posted on
03/13/2008 11:32:10 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: gondramB
Exactly. People with integrity and are moral don’t have to hide anything.
13
posted on
03/14/2008 12:02:04 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: gondramB
14
posted on
03/14/2008 1:12:19 AM PDT
by
skr
(How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
To: skr
Its about time Congress didn't debate national security tools in front of the world. You know in a perfect world, one with a congress full of patriots, the bill could be debated in open.
They would as one stand and tell the enemy in no uncertain terms we will get them with all the technology, surveillance and more importantly resolve we can muster as a nation.
Instead we suffer from fools who can't or won't allow agencies to do their job. Congressmen who frankly subvert this government, through warped morality and a lack of honor.
15
posted on
03/14/2008 1:21:21 AM PDT
by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: gondramB
Before we begin this newsconference, I want to call
your attention to the hard copy of the report we
prepared for the media and have just handed out.
16
posted on
03/14/2008 3:08:02 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: SkyPilot
Now, now, I’m sure there are clear protocols for leaking classified information.
17
posted on
03/14/2008 3:10:47 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: skr
Don’t worry , the Dems are traitors and whores so they will leak anything that benefits them.
18
posted on
03/14/2008 3:12:36 AM PDT
by
sonic109
To: SkyPilot
Oh my God what a brain trust that is.....
Thank God they are not Proctologist.............
19
posted on
03/14/2008 3:13:24 AM PDT
by
taildragger
(The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
To: gondramB
Now, now, Im sure there are clear protocols for leaking classified information. Well, you're right.
These two Senators have to told what Classified information is being leaked so they can erase their sent e-mail messages.
20
posted on
03/14/2008 3:15:01 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson