Skip to comments.
Indian DNA Links To 6 'Founding Mothers'
Yahoo News/AP ^
| 3-13-2008
| Malcom Ritter
Posted on 03/13/2008 2:04:39 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Thanks to Trillion for the article.
1
posted on
03/13/2008 2:04:40 PM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv; Coyoteman; Trillion
2
posted on
03/13/2008 2:05:09 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
They could probably narrow it down to a single founding father...
How does that line go.... KKKKKAAAAAHHHHHHNNNNNNNNN
To: blam
Has any one ever done sea bed studies to see if that area actually connected despite the common sense view that it probably was....seems to me they could do some core studies to see if they could find human artifacts from about that era before the seas submerged that area.
4
posted on
03/13/2008 2:08:48 PM PDT
by
mdmathis6
To: blam
Nearly all of today's Native Americans in North, Central and South America can trace part of their ancestry to six women whose descendants immigrated around 20,000 years ago, a DNA study suggests. But...but...I thought they were Native Americans, you mean they weren't from here originally?
5
posted on
03/13/2008 2:09:51 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: dfwgator
I thought they were Hebrew....LOL
6
posted on
03/13/2008 2:12:28 PM PDT
by
colorcountry
(To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: blam
To: colorcountry
I thought they were Hebrew....LOL "Hast du sehen in deine leben? Dey're darker than us! Woof!"
8
posted on
03/13/2008 2:14:34 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: blam
This is interesting because my Wife insist Native Americans did NOT come from Asia and may well have been here all along.
A show on the History channel (Making of 10,000 BC) suggested 2 or more groups came here 13,500 years ago. One from Europe and another from Asia.
It’s just a easy for me to believe some groups may have come from the south.
9
posted on
03/13/2008 2:17:35 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(Hank Hill's Dad, Cruella and Curious George=Loony Toons)
To: dfwgator
immigrated - We are ALL ILLEAGLES?
10
posted on
03/13/2008 2:17:39 PM PDT
by
SF Republican
(Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
To: dfwgator
Nobody likes a smart ass.
11
posted on
03/13/2008 2:17:56 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: Trillion
12
posted on
03/13/2008 2:18:00 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: dfwgator
But....but.....but, I heard tell they were one of the lost tribes of the Israelites.
13
posted on
03/13/2008 2:19:18 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
To: wolfcreek
Native Americans did NOT come from Asia - I don't want to be racist (but since race is the subject) I have always noticed a great similarity between the looks, skin tones, hair color, and eye color between American Indians and Asians.
14
posted on
03/13/2008 2:19:32 PM PDT
by
SF Republican
(Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
To: wolfcreek
I think you are right. I believe some Polynesians made it to South American and came north, making three ports of entry.
15
posted on
03/13/2008 2:20:18 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: blam
If there where only six original women then I'm going to take a guess a say that the Indians arrived by boat rather then a supposed land mass.
More would have arrived if they came by a land bridge, IMHO.
To: Blue State Insurgent
If there where only six original women then I'm going to take a guess a say that the Indians arrived by boat rather then a supposed land mass. More would have arrived if they came by a land bridge, IMHO.
The land bridge still seems to have been the source for most migration. There were one or more coastal migrations, but they seem to have been small, and didn't result in much spread to the interior.
Here is a good recent article: Beringian Standstill and Spread of Native American Founders.
17
posted on
03/13/2008 2:29:36 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: SF Republican
Their eyes and skeletal forms are different but, coming to a new land would modify (or mutate) their appearance over time.
BTW: My Wife and I have NA blood and many NA friends but, none of us are very PC.
18
posted on
03/13/2008 2:29:57 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(Hank Hill's Dad, Cruella and Curious George=Loony Toons)
To: blam
19
posted on
03/13/2008 2:31:28 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: fish hawk
And when you consider the moving continents, groups may have been separated or join throughout history.
20
posted on
03/13/2008 2:32:09 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(Hank Hill's Dad, Cruella and Curious George=Loony Toons)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson