[1rudeboy]

Man, you have a serious problem, since my contention is about the way Corsi goes about "proving" anything (i.e., it's not a matter of what was actually discussed, but rather the journalistic rule "imposed" by the State Dept. that proves it). So I suppose that this is another instance in your long list of failures to understand a basic concept. Are you just playing stupid, or is it a prerequisite for your crowd?

[Man50D]

Man, you have a serious problem, since my contention is about the way Corsi goes about "proving" anything (i.e., it's not a matter of what was actually discussed, but rather the journalistic rule "imposed" by the State Dept. that proves it).

Now your making personal attacks. Very creative. I'll just add that to the growing list of obfuscation to avoid naming your sources. You could have stated this latest concocted excuse in your original post instead of waiting until post #216. You should try and focus. This is the most ridiculous excuse yet considering the title of the article Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab specifically deals with Corsi's claim the meeting took place to advance the NAU cause.

Any luck yet finding those sources?