[Man50D]

Man, you have a serious problem, since my contention is about the way Corsi goes about "proving" anything (i.e., it's not a matter of what was actually discussed, but rather the journalistic rule "imposed" by the State Dept. that proves it).

Now your making personal attacks. Very creative. I'll just add that to the growing list of obfuscation to avoid naming your sources. You could have stated this latest concocted excuse in your original post instead of waiting until post #216. You should try and focus. This is the most ridiculous excuse yet considering the title of the article Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab specifically deals with Corsi's claim the meeting took place to advance the NAU cause.

Any luck yet finding those sources?

[1rudeboy]

Now your making personal attacks. Very creative.

Here's an update for you: don't dish it out if you can't take it. And don't whine about it when it happens to you after you do it.