Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 13, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Man50D]

WASHINGTON -- A largely unreported meeting held at the State Department discussed integration of the U.S., Mexico and Canada in concert with a move toward a transatlantic union, linking a North American community with the European Union.

The meeting was held Monday under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, or ACIEP. WND obtained press credentials and attended as an observer. The meeting was held under "Chatham House" rules that prohibit reporters from attributing specific comments to individual participants.

The State Department website noted the meeting was opened by Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs Daniel S. Sullivan and ACIEP Chairman Michael Gadbaw, vice president and senior counsel for General Electric's International Law & Policy group since December 1990.

WND observed about 25 ACIEP members, including U.S. corporations involved in international trade, prominent U.S. business trade groups, law firms involved with international business law, international investment firms and other international trade consultants.

No members of Congress attended the meeting.

The agenda for the ACIEP meeting was not published, and State Department officials in attendance could not give WND permission under Chatham House rules to publish the agenda.

[jmc813]

I was kidding about being turned on by them, you sex pervert. :-)

[1rudeboy]

I was just giving you affirmation. What do I know?

[jmc813]

Fair ‘nuff. I’ve got a little Friday evening confab of my own with my old friend John Daniels next door, so jmc out. Good weekend, all.

[Globalist Goon]

I’m pulling hair and kicking.

Anyways, I could care less anymore. The Globalists win...congrats to all the enablers.

[redgolum]

Ok, it is tin foil Friday, so I will comment on this.

Part of me used to think this was just all BS, but the fact is most multinational companies act like it is a given.

The other thing, is if I was going to set up a situation to have everyone BEG for a NAU, the coming economic storm would be one.

[Mr. Silverback]

And here is the: “who gives a sh*t what you think” retort.

Well, if you don't care what I think, why are you asking me to take policy positions? And why in the world would you expect anyone to answer your question with anything but "I oppose those things, too?" You might as well ask if someone opposes torturing puppies.

I'm not interested in playing whatever silly game you're playing. If you feel like having the last word, do so, but I don't answer to you.

[Mr. Silverback]

And here is the: “who gives a sh*t what you think” retort.

Then you are a complete idiot. And no, that isn't an insult, it's a statement of fact. If you have any doubts about Jim Robinson's patriotism, you are not terribly bright and shouldn't be posting on this board.

[Mr. Silverback]

Thanks!

[Mr. Silverback]

If I could, would I be asking?

I guess I have to hold your hand, then.

It is considered proper FR etiqutte to ping someone if you quote them.

All better now?

[Mr. Silverback]

I think what we are trying to do is wake you guys up.

Ah, so the best way to do that is to open with accusations of stupidity, treason and greed. Well, I really appreciate your advice on effective communication.

[Mr. Silverback]

You're starting to protestath too much.

Another round of "You aren't 100% in agreement wit me, therefore you have dark, suspect motives." Interesting...

[Mr. Silverback]

Thanks for your really important contribution.

[jmc813]

Wazzup, Mr. Delayed Reaction?

[Mr. Silverback]

ouch..should have hit preview. Duh. Let me try that again:

I wouldn't have asked the question if I knew the answer in advance.

Then you are a complete idiot. And no, that isn't an insult, it's a statement of fact. If you have any doubts about Jim Robinson's patriotism, you are not terribly bright and shouldn't be posting on this board.

[Mr. Silverback]

Dude, when did I put you in charge of my schedule? :-)

[Calpernia]

No, not better. You just confirmed you were addressing me with your comment:

"And you folks wonder why there are so many skeptics..."

That brings us right back to my to my question to you:

Since you used the word folkS with your statement along with your ping, you are accusing me of something. State what it is or shut up.

[Mr. Silverback]

And how many times do I have to say the comment itself was directed at Man50D before you will understand that?

Now please, take a class, or get some reading glasses or something.

[wolfcreek]

I could care less if you agree with me or not.

IMO, your consistent whining would lead one to believe you a collaborator or of having a *vested* interest. What percentage DO you believe to be factual?

[Man50D]

Then you are a complete idiot. And no, that isn't an insult, it's a statement of fact. If you have any doubts about Jim Robinson's patriotism, you are not terribly bright and shouldn't be posting on this board.

Get a grip. Jerome Corsi and World NetDaily have been trying to defend America and prevent our elected officials from ceding our national sovereignty to a world order by consistently providing detailed information.

They provide too many details for none of it to be true. Instead of recognizing this fact you and your fellow World Net daily haters question Corsi's and WND's patriotism for trying to defend our country from such a movement by reacting like Pavlov's dog and attempt to kill the messenger by spewing invectives and insults instead of providing your own detailed facts.

Someone questions moving the thread to Bloggers and Personal for no legitimate reason and you continue the attacks by defending the patriotism of one website while summarily dismissing the patriotism of another website, who is attempting to defend the country, despite thorough investigative research. Don't look now but your hypocrisy and twisted sense of loyalty are showing.

[Designer]

"..open with accusations of stupidity, treason and greed."

I certainly don't remember doing that. If you say I did, then I apologize.