Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 13, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Man50D]

WASHINGTON -- A largely unreported meeting held at the State Department discussed integration of the U.S., Mexico and Canada in concert with a move toward a transatlantic union, linking a North American community with the European Union.

The meeting was held Monday under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, or ACIEP. WND obtained press credentials and attended as an observer. The meeting was held under "Chatham House" rules that prohibit reporters from attributing specific comments to individual participants.

The State Department website noted the meeting was opened by Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs Daniel S. Sullivan and ACIEP Chairman Michael Gadbaw, vice president and senior counsel for General Electric's International Law & Policy group since December 1990.

WND observed about 25 ACIEP members, including U.S. corporations involved in international trade, prominent U.S. business trade groups, law firms involved with international business law, international investment firms and other international trade consultants.

No members of Congress attended the meeting.

The agenda for the ACIEP meeting was not published, and State Department officials in attendance could not give WND permission under Chatham House rules to publish the agenda.

[processing please hold]

Do you believe the SPP and CFR exist?

[1rudeboy]

Yes. What kind of a silly question is that?

[wastedyears]

I think the author would lose more than his job.

[1rudeboy]

In fact, now that I think about it, I find it nearly impossible for you to ask that sort of a question (of me) without suffering from a serious case of amnesia.

[1rudeboy]

Right. So he can dance around the issue with impunity, with no threat of harm, but the minute he violates a journalistic code of honor . . . .

[Man50D]

It’s actually somewhat humorous for a Corsi-sceptic to have a discussion with a Corsi-believer, when the sceptic has read Corsi’s book, and the believer has not.

And your sources are?

[DBrow]

ExSoldier, Bush did give a speech to joint Congress 11 Sept 1990, in which he mentioned “new world order” three or four times:

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Toward_a_New_World_Order

Bush did not give a NWO speech at the UN.

[wastedyears]

Duncan Hunter is still fighting the good fight.

[1rudeboy]

What, that I have read his book? You want my public library records? Good luck getting them to hand that over without a court order, and even then . . . .

[Man50D]

Vast top-secret conspiracy moved to breaking news.

Since when does FR consider a recognized news source as a blog? If it is considered a blog then how is any other internet news website not considered a blog?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

"participants are free to use the information received"

This paints a rather poor (or illogical) picture of Corsi, no?

[NoWayMcCain]

"The federal government has no plans to erase our borders. The U.S. dollar will live forever. Fifty years from now it will still be around, there will be no combined currencies. It's all a lie, just like when people in Europe started getting wind of some mythical merger. Did that happen? Trust your federal government, we'd never sell you nor your nation's sovereignty out."

[processing please hold]

Well, you didn’t answer my question.

[1rudeboy]

Kinda’ lost you right after “yes,” then.

[Man50D]

I’ve never thought of FR as a loony bin, but if this is breaking news, then I’m in kookville.

Don't worry. You're not a kook. I didn't post it as breaking news. I posted it as News/Activism. It was then changed to Bloggers and Personal.

[processing please hold]

Cal, wasn’t there a thread on FR a couple of days ago concerning Condi and china’s human rights abuses being taken off the table when it came to PNTR?

[1rudeboy]

Like I’ve been saying, it’s just the hook . . . .

[Man50D]

What, that I have read his book? You want my public library records? Good luck getting them to hand that over without a court order, and even then . . . .

No, I just want those sources you claim are so easy to cite. So what are they again?

[1rudeboy]

Sources of what? Stop playing stupid.

[processing please hold]

I’m sorry. I fell off track there. I’m looking at something concerning china’s free trade and the CFR report.