Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican
...and Hillary would obviously welcome anything that reduces the prominence of the Spitzer story (and the unavoidable mention of Spitzer supporting Hillary).

Good point...and for another pesky congruency as well:

As I recall, Bill's lying under oath about sex was CLEARLY NOT perjury, so shouldn't Spitzer's money laundering (ONLY that portion that was for sex) and Mann Act violations (ONLY those that involved sex) and interstate transport (for sex only) ALSO be overlooked by the Judicial Apparatus????

As I understand America's new Clintonian jurisprudence, any conduct otherwise criminal in nature becomes totally innocent if pursued solely for purposes of sexual gratification of the Liberal Libido...

164 posted on 03/12/2008 5:54:08 PM PDT by O Neill (Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: O Neill
".....so shouldn't Spitzer's money laundering......"

I have a gut feeling that the money that was laundered was not his money. I have a gut feeling state funds were used for his liaisons.

167 posted on 03/12/2008 6:21:41 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson