Posted on 03/11/2008 3:48:22 PM PDT by varina davis
I wasn't commenting on whether Mr. Romney would be good vice presidential choice or not (although I don't think that he would - he adds little appeal to the ticket with critical constituencies).
Rather, Mr. Romney said this:
“’There are really no hard feelings, I don’t think, on either side of this,’ he said in the interview.”
Whether or not Mr. Romney would be a good pick, this statement is pure wishful thinking. I think that Mr. McCain does have hard feelings, and I don't think he'd even entertain the notion of picking Mr. Romney. Whether that's right or wrong.
sitetest
She is the classless poster who posted remarks deriding Hunter for not buttoning his coat, inferring he was slobbish and made snide comments regarding Mrs. Thompson and repeatedly posted a picture of the Huckabees before Mike’s weight loss ... she is anything but a Lady.
That is an ignorant statement. Romney set up trusts years ago for his sons. But then again these threads are about bashing Romney and offer nothing of substance.
Seems like many FReepers would only vote for Reagan. Too bad he hasn’t campaigned for the past 24 years.
“I’d prefer a Conservative, who would be competitive after McVain retires. My vote would be for George Allen.”
Exactly
Mark Sanford could deliver the South and be the next president after Johnny’s one and only term. Very good man.
need another southern ‘something’, or someone from ohio. someone who can bring in a huge state with winner take all electors.
“Yeah. Romney’s a real vote getter. He wowed them in the primaries.”
I think Mitt spent $400 a vote. At that rate, he’d suck what little life there is out of McInsane.
You kiddin’? That RINO? Ah hain’t avotin’ fer him. ;-)
Yes, he would bring financial expertise to the ticket and also...is a great campaigner and VERY articulate.
I like Mitt.
Am I wrong or do you support McCain/Romney?
LOL.
I posted a few days ago that Karl Rove was on Fox talking about how young people he had met were very enthusiastic about Romney as VP. He never endorsed anyone of course but he mentioned Romney’s name three times. It could be a good position for him, and probably as high as he can aspire in politics for the next several years.
thats just bizarre.
I can understand attacks on mccain but Mark Sanford is as pure as 24 karat gold.
And you know this how? You were at the statewide polling stations? You studied the database from the Secretary of State results along with exit polls? Or are you just parroting nonsense because you think it has some basis in fact? Did you know ID was required? Did you know that you had to sign for a ballot for the party you were to vote for? What makes you think the average GOPer ever heard of KOS? Do you understand nothing about union votes in a blue state? (They don't cross.)
Can you not read a calendar and understand that Mitt won in January and McCain had it wrapped up by the time TX came around?
It's just a simple fact that you know nothing of which you speak. When in quicksand, quit digging.
Also, Michigan is just one state. If he’s on the ticket, many social conservatives will just stay home as they have enough problems with McCain.
Socons aren't exactly ruling the roost if you haven't noticed, note McCain winning the nomination. They will still stay home home based on who is on TOP of the ticket, not the bottom.
In case that is misunderstood, I am referring to both men being of high moral character, not to their politics, because Mark is much more conservative than Mitt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.