Skip to comments.
Trash today, ethanol tomorrow: Invention promises major advance in biofuel production (No Corn!)
www.physorg.com ^
| 03/10/2008
| Staff
Posted on 03/11/2008 12:13:11 PM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
At last, a ethanol process that doesn't require "FOOD"..........
To: Red Badger
Ethanol ruins your engine, gets less MPG, and costs more to use in the long run. Why anyone would want to use this junk is beyond me.
2
posted on
03/11/2008 12:21:14 PM PDT
by
LukeL
To: Red Badger
3
posted on
03/11/2008 12:21:14 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
To: Red Badger
Could use all the plant material mowed and cut from interstate and other highways.. trillions of pounds not now even gathered.... More highways could be planted with “grass”.. or whats that plant in Geogia that grows a foot a day.. that you cant get rid of..
4
posted on
03/11/2008 12:22:10 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: Red Badger
If it pans out, this sounds promising. The whole ethanol from corn thing just seemed like a lot of tail-chasing.
5
posted on
03/11/2008 12:22:26 PM PDT
by
LadyJMayo
To: Red Badger
Back in 2003, Discover magazine had an article called "Anything Into Oil," about how we would soon be using thermal depolymzerization to make as much oil as we could ever want, out of garbage, sewage, and agricultural waste. The article seemed genuine. After all, it was in Discover magazne. I believed it.
But it turned out to be bogus. The predictions that were in the article never came true.
So now I am very skeptical of these kinds of claims. If this new article is true, then why isn't the product available on the open market for people to buy? My guess is that it's probably as bogus as the article from 5 years ago.
6
posted on
03/11/2008 12:22:34 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: hosepipe
7
posted on
03/11/2008 12:26:31 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: LukeL
8
posted on
03/11/2008 12:29:33 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: grundle
9
posted on
03/11/2008 12:30:59 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: hosepipe
or whats that plant in Georgia that grows a foot a day.. Marijuana
10
posted on
03/11/2008 12:32:03 PM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
To: Red Badger; hosepipe
11
posted on
03/11/2008 12:34:56 PM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
To: Richard Kimball
12
posted on
03/11/2008 12:35:08 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: Red Badger
Well, that’s all fine and good until we deplete the earth of trash. We’ll have all kinds of Greenies complaining about the lack of McDonald wrappers and beer bottles on the side of the road.
13
posted on
03/11/2008 12:39:21 PM PDT
by
keats5
(tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
To: ErnBatavia
Finally! A solution to the KUDZU problem!........
14
posted on
03/11/2008 12:40:57 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: LadyJMayo
The whole ethanol from corn thing just seemed like a lot of tail-chasing. You mean "wallet filling" :)
To: Red Badger
My point is that it’s all talk. They aren’t actually making and selling it on a large scale.
16
posted on
03/11/2008 12:58:15 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: LukeL; All
Ethanol ruins your engine, gets less MPG, and costs more to use in the long run. Why anyone would want to use this junk is beyond me. What's the lesser evil, imperfect domestic ethanol or foreign oil that we cannot afford?
As a side note to promising energy alternatives, consider this high density fuel cell.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983282/posts
To: Red Badger
Ethanol doesn’t burn our food RB, unless you want to call soda pop food.
18
posted on
03/11/2008 1:18:59 PM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(Don't think I can vote for you John, I'm feelin' like a maverick.)
To: Red Badger
This appears to actually be quite promising...plus it starts with the letter “E” - very important.
Think of all the leaves raked up each fall...or the land cleared down here in FL for housing. Mountains and mountains of feedstock for these little critters...
To: Free Vulcan
Corn sweetener may not qualify as a “real” food, but corn is used for much more than that. Chicken feeds, cattle feeds, and pork are all in the mix. Anything that is related to corn thru them is also, cooking oils, milk, cheese, butter, eggs, bread and on down the line. The grocery prices are higher than I’ve ever seen them, and it’s not all due to higher oil prices.
20
posted on
03/11/2008 1:32:45 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson