[Scourge of God]

But Hillary Clinton is not going to relent.

Just speaking objectively here for a moment--do you want a president that would 'relent'?

[rurgan]

Hillary is not going to relent on her mission to turn the U.S. into a socialist state and to import hundreds of millions of illegals.

[OESY]

Answering objectively, I would want a president who played by the rules, who did't try all sorts of shameless dirty tricks, who indeed had character and integrity. In contrast, however, I would not want this Democratic presidential candidate to relent, but to try whatever means available to win her party's nomination, even if it meant seriously and irreparably splitting her party. For many observers, it would confirm in their minds that the Clintons are little more than grifters who act only in their own self-interest--people who would invariably avoid doing what was right for the country. Past examples include dishonest attacks on businesses and free trade in order to capture the populist vote. Her relentless attacks on Obama, which she usually ascribes to the Republican playbook to avoid any personal culpability, are more of the same.

.

[Mygirlsmom]

Just speaking objectively here for a moment--do you want a president that would 'relent'?

Depends. War on Terror? No. Ramming rampant socialism down our throats and out the back end? Absolutely.