Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

That prioritization (by the RCC) also has long been hard for me to understand. Putting “wearing a rubber” in the same category as pushing lethal drugs or abortions?

I’m not disparaging that the RCC genuinely reads God’s word that way. I just ... wow.


60 posted on 03/10/2008 10:47:21 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: pogo101
Let's talk about prioritization. In the area of morality, matters involving human life and the sources of life (where life comes from) are considered to be of the highest category of importance. There's hardly anybody who will disagree with that. Murder (unjust assault on human life) is objectively worse than vandalism (unjust assault on property.)

In the same way, directly sterilizing someone (deliberate destruction of source of life) is objectively worse than other kinds of maiming (say, deliberately breaking somebody's nose).

Notice the word "objectively." As in any sin, subjective guilt can be either aggravated (by defiance or malice, say) or mitigated (by faulty knowledge or lack on full willfulness.)

Perhaps somebody else could recommend a good work on morality which would deal with this more systematically and comprehensively. All I can think of is Right and Reason by Austin Fagothey, which I am delighted to find is available in its 2000 Edition.

Enjoy.

288 posted on 03/11/2008 8:44:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The Church of the Living God: the Pillar and Foundation of the Truth." 1 Timothy 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson