[Mrs. Don-o]

Let's talk about prioritization. In the area of morality, matters involving human life and the sources of life (where life comes from) are considered to be of the highest category of importance. There's hardly anybody who will disagree with that. Murder (unjust assault on human life) is objectively worse than vandalism (unjust assault on property.)

In the same way, directly sterilizing someone (deliberate destruction of source of life) is objectively worse than other kinds of maiming (say, deliberately breaking somebody's nose).

Notice the word "objectively." As in any sin, subjective guilt can be either aggravated (by defiance or malice, say) or mitigated (by faulty knowledge or lack on full willfulness.)

Perhaps somebody else could recommend a good work on morality which would deal with this more systematically and comprehensively. All I can think of is Right and Reason by Austin Fagothey, which I am delighted to find is available in its 2000 Edition.

Enjoy.

[pogo101]

I don’t doubt that such is the RCC’s point of view. I don’t share it if it means that using a condom is in the same category of moral transgression as procuring or performing an abortion.

[Froufrou]

That is just a fine post. Pure and simple. But, what about the fact that ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse?’