Posted on 03/09/2008 4:35:40 PM PDT by abb
He probably has a couple of baby mommas who will turn him in for the right money.
shame on the Durham,NC area....
“if he kills a black girl and leaves her in the street I will assume he is race neutral until then I would be suspicious that this might have been part of the motivation”
I see. I’d be MUCH more likely to assume that the perp picked out somebody who looked like they had money and would be easy prey.
"Skank"? You don't even know the meaning of the word.
It will guarantee that the case is DEAD to the media now.
Maybe. Maybe not. That may be face paint. Who wears a batting helmet under a hood? He’s hiding.
If you murder a person the way Eve Carson was murdered anywhere south of the Mason/Dixon line, you will be tried as an adult unless you are under 13.
Whoever is convicted of this crime will get life without the possibility of parole. And noone will be taking the weight for anyone else in this scenario once the police are through with the interviews.
Police in my area also give the race of a suspect and it’s put out by the media, although not necessarily when you’ve got a picture this clear. Some of the posts about race on this thread are in a completely different vein than what you and I are talking about.
if robbery was the motive he would have robbed her, he went ahead and killed her and judging from the fact that he did not hide his face from the camera I doubt that it was to prevent her from IDing him
“It will guarantee that the case is DEAD to the media now.”
What will?
Police believe the suspect to be wearing this hat.
It's not a batting helmet.
The current fashion trends in the inner city include wearing a brand new baseball cap one full size too large for one's head, with the visor completely unbent and flat to preserve the look of newness. Most wear it with the MLB hologram sticker still on the visor.
Another fashion trend is the oversized, zip-up front hooded sweatshirt.
An oversized hood over an oversized baseball cap is de rigueur in many neighborhoods.
Because that’s what the ATM camera captured. Doctoring a digital image and embedding an “H” doesn’t make it so (and is easy to do), it’s falsifying evidence. Let the perp hang on the facts.
He probably had no clue that the drive-thru ATM had an embedded camera. He may have used the drive-thru specifically to avoid the security cameras he knew would be present in a bank building ATM vestibule.
We're not dealing with a diabolical genius here, just a street punk.
“if robbery was the motive he would have robbed her, he went ahead and killed her and judging from the fact that he did not hide his face from the camera I doubt that it was to prevent her from IDing him”
Come on now. No matter what his motive I think he would have hidden his face if he had known he was on camera. You think the guy didn’t care if he was identified in what will be a capital case? The guy was either too stupid or too high to know that some ATMs have cameras.
As for why he killed the girl, he might have done it for fun, to keep her from IDing him, or because she fought back or screamed.
ok......sure looked like a helmet to me. Don’t people know they are on camera at ATMs.?
“Let the perp hang...”
In a just world...
The H is clearly visible in the black-and-white security camera photos. It's right there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.