Posted on 03/08/2008 2:47:48 PM PST by K-oneTexas
I don't buy that, but I will buy The use of Drugs has done more to erode liberty in this country.
Use is the root of the problem.
Granting amnesty to 25+ million illegals is better for America?
Sure, he'll talk a decent game concerning the WOT/Iraq, but when illegals (mexican, saudi, iranian) can walk across our border at will (with or without a dirty nuke), he is not doing us any favors.
Pull your head out of your rear end!
No, YOU stop complaining. McCain will be INFINITELY better for the country than either of the two socialists. McCain has seen that he CANNOT win without the conservative base and he knows that he MUST promise and then deliver a law that will secure the borders and reduce the number if illegals (and not by instant citizenship) if he wants to be elected and then re-elected.
If you cannot see that McCain would be better than the Beast or Obama, then you may as well cast your vote for the ‘Rat.
Take your sour grapes and your pouting elsewhere. It is not needed here.
You're right, he will promise.
Quit your own damn whining already. McManiac is not and never will be a conservative. He doesn't give a damn about the conservative side of the house, so we're skipping out on him.
unless you want to get rid of aspirin and the like.
And he will deliver if he wants to be re-elected.
Then be prepared for a ‘Rat in the White House for the next 8 years, because you and your sour grapes buddies will deliver it to the ‘Rats on a silver plater.
Then be prepared for a ‘Rat in the White House for the next 8 years, because you and your sour grapes buddies will deliver it to the ‘Rats on a silver plater. No matter what you want, you are NOT going to get a conservative in the WH.
Then maybe the Republitards will learn to run to the right. Enjoy it.
You’ll teach us a lesson, all right. You’ll teach us that you would rather have a far left socialist in the WH than a person who isn’t “conservative enough” for you. You will teach us that you are as marginalized as the moonbat left. You will teach us that you would rather have nothing rather than 80% of what you want. You will teach us that rather than move the country a little right, you would rather let the ‘Rats move it way left because of your temper tantrum.
I don’t want to see ONE WORD of complaint from you sour grape crybabies when Obama or the Beast take the WH and name more liberals to the high court. I don’t to see ONE WORD about how much socialized medicine is costing. Don’t complain here about instant citizenship for 12 million uneducated new ‘Rat voters. Don’t whine when Obama gives Al Queda a win in Iraq. Because THAT will be the cost of your “principles”.
All you crybabies make me sick that you would throw away YEARS of steady rightward movement because your man didn’t get the nomination. Just go away.
Just ask yourself these questions: 1)Who has a legitimate chance of winning in November? 2)Of those TWO (and there will be only two at this point), who would be better (or if you prefer, worse) for America? Vote accordingly.
I believe the appropriate expression at this point of your 'debate' is fu#$ you and the horse you rode in under jack.
Who gives a damn what you think ... you want a republican victory, run to the right and stop nominating RINOs.
You sound like a ‘Rat, trying to blame others because a the person you wanted didn’t get the nomination. The fact is that there was no conservative running who had a chance.
No Booze is still legal and it is a drug that kills.
if you want to ban aspirin and budweiser, good luck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.