Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush tours Volvo display
eTrucker.com ^ | 3/7/08 | John Baxter

Posted on 03/08/2008 9:52:20 AM PST by bjs1779

President Bush toured a display of Volvo renew- able- energy vehicles March 5 at the AB Volvo Group booth at the International Renewable Energy Conference in Washington.

The trucks are designed to run on a variety of renewable fuels, ranging from natural and synthetic biodiesel that can run in today’s engines to more exotic liquid and gas fuels that would require vehicle modifications to make them practical, clean and efficient. Refinery and distribution networks also would have to be built.

Mack, a Volvo brand, showed off a heavy-duty electric hybrid dump truck designed to recover energy from the brakes and exhaust to run engine accessories and help in acceleration.

After receiving a tour of the booth from Volvo AB Chairman Leif Johansson and Mack Trucks President and CEO Paul Vikner, Bush gave the conference’s keynote address.

“The more sources of energy we have, the less influence any one of them, such as oil, has over the United States’ security and prosperity,” Bush said. “Renewable fuels are some of the most promising new sources of energy because they are clean and because they can be regenerated.”

“The United States is serious about climate change,” Bush said. “But we need an effective international agreement that is result-oriented. No country should get a free ride.”

The most well-publicized such international agreement, the Kyoto Protocol of 1997, was never submitted to the U.S. Senate for ratification by either the Clinton or Bush administrations, partially because it exempts the world’s second largest emitter of carbon dioxide after the United States: China.

Bush noted the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 mandates the production of various renewable fuels as well as improved efficiency for automobiles, lighting, and appliances.

Critics argue the mandates don’t go far enough, and California has sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in an attempt to implement stricter rules on motor-vehicle emissions.

At a press conference held later at the Volvo booth, Johansson joined Maud Olofsson, Swedish minister for enterprise and energy, and Andy Karsner, assistant U.S. energy secretary, in describing the progress made by Volvo and Mack in developing alternative-energy vehicles, a project undertaken in a joint agreement between the U.S. and Swedish governments.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; bush; energyindependence; sweden; volvo

1 posted on 03/08/2008 9:52:20 AM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
The big trucks were neat. The 150 mpg of gas equivalent flex-fuel, plug-in hybrids were even neater.

I'm looking forward to the day when we can send a nice, polite diplomatic message to the sheiks: "See sand. Go pound."

2 posted on 03/08/2008 10:05:10 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779

What next ... the Vagina Monologues?


3 posted on 03/08/2008 10:14:37 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779

Volvo has a reputation for safety - but I wonder if these new hybrids are made lighter, like new cars, for added fuel efficiency? Which would also make them less safe in a crash


4 posted on 03/08/2008 10:33:34 AM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
"The 150 mpg of gas equivalent flex-fuel, plug-in hybrids were even neater. I'm looking forward to the day when we can send a nice, polite diplomatic message to the sheiks: "See sand. Go pound."

Hmmm.
Where do you think electricity comes from?

Clue: Fossil fuels.

And the efficiency of converting fossil fuel to electricity, transmitting the electricity, charging batteries, then running a truck off the batteries:
How do you suppose that compares to the efficiency of simply running the truck engine on fossil fuel?

If you said, "Very poorly," you're almost as smart as a fifth-grader...

5 posted on 03/08/2008 11:44:53 AM PST by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
"Volvo has a reputation for safety..."

Volvo cars, that is: and they're owned and run by Ford.

Keep in mind Volvo Trucks are a totally separate company, and not near the top of U.S. truck manufacturers.

6 posted on 03/08/2008 11:47:22 AM PST by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
"I wonder if these new hybrids are made lighter, like new cars, for added fuel efficiency?"

Nope:
The purpose of trucks is to carry stuff, and you can't do that unless you're strong enough to hold the "stuff" up.

7 posted on 03/08/2008 11:49:13 AM PST by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779

Oh, man. I quickly scanned the headline and thought the President was at the V-Monologues.

Sure sign my brain’s fried......


8 posted on 03/08/2008 11:56:12 AM PST by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

“Volvo cars, that is: and they’re owned and run by Ford.”

Keep in mind Volvo Trucks are a totally separate company, and not near the top of U.S. truck manufacturers.”

- A lot of people are unaware of this fact, just like few seem to realize there exists no company by the name “Panasonic” (just one of many brands owned by Matsushita Ltd.).

Greetings from Gothenburg, Sweden, (nowadays) base of two corporations named “Volvo”.


9 posted on 03/08/2008 12:37:46 PM PST by WesternCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
And the efficiency of converting fossil fuel to electricity, transmitting the electricity, charging batteries, then running a truck off the batteries: How do you suppose that compares to the efficiency of simply running the truck engine on fossil fuel? If you said, "Very poorly," you're almost as smart as a fifth-grader...

I take it you're running your car on coal?

10 posted on 03/08/2008 4:21:20 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson