Election 2008: Michigan Democratic Presidential Primary Michigan: Clinton 41% Obama 41%

If Democrats hold a second Presidential Primary in Michigan, the race could be one of the most competitive all year. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that Hillary Clinton would attract 41% of the Primary Vote while Barack Obama would earn an identical 41%.

Clinton leads by seven among women and trails by eight among men. Clinton does better with low-income voters and Obama does better among upper-income voters. Obama leads among voters under 50 while Clinton leads among older voters.

Michigan voted on January 15 in violation of Democratic Party rules and Hillary Clinton was the only major candidate to have her name on the ballot. Despite that, she barely won a majority, attracting 55% of the vote while 40% voted for “uncommitted” delegates. There has been talk of a "do-over" primary so that Michigan’s delegates can be counted at the Democratic convention in August.

Separate survey data shows that 62% of Democrats in Michigan favor a do-over while 24% are opposed. Republicans oppose the idea of a second primary by nearly identical margins.

Clinton leads by eight among Democrats while Obama leads by eight among others who would participate. Michigan’s Primaries are open to all voters and the survey indicates that the Democrats would constitute just a little more than half of the Primary Voters. Ironically, this same dynamic worked to give John McCain a victory over George W. Bush in Michigan during the Election 2000 Primary Season. It would be truly amazing if one of the decisive contests for the Democratic nomination took place in an environment where half the voters were from outside the party.

Florida, another state considering a do-over election, holds closed Primaries where only Democrats can vote. Clinton holds a solid lead in Florida.

Among Michigan’s Likely Primary Voters, Clinton is viewed favorably by 60%. Obama earns positive reviews from 67%.

If Clinton wins the nomination, just 50% of Obama voters say they would be even somewhat likely to vote for her against John McCain. Thirty-five percent (35%) say they are Not at All Likely to vote for Clinton in the general election.

On the other hand, if Obama wins the nomination, just 52% of Clinton voters would be even somewhat likely to vote for him against John McCain. Twenty-five percent (25%) say they are Not at All Likely to vote for Obama in the general election.

Those results may be impacted by Republicans and Republican-leaning independents participating in the Primary. But, even among Democrats, there is hesitance to support both candidates. Just 60% of Democrats say they would be Very Likely to vote for whoever wins the nomination. Seventy-one percent (71%) say they would be at least Somewhat Likely to vote for whoever wins. Obviously, those attitudes may change over time and they may be impacted by the manner in which the race for the nomination is ended.

I suspect that Michigan is the rare state where Obama might actually be hurt by a caucus (as opposed to a primary), given that a substantial portion of his backing would be in Detroit and I suspect getting turnout up high in Detroit may be difficult.

His base has got to be Detroit-Ann Arbor-East Lansing vs. the rest of the state (including the entire Detroit 'burbs) for Hillary.

Hillary would win handily in Michigan. The economy is in the tank here. I’ve lived here all my life and don’t ever remember seeing so many people who are clearly poor.

The manufacturing base has been destroyed by NAFTA and the greed of the big unions. It’s a disaster. People are looking for a new FDR, I don’t think it’s Barry.

"Hillary would win handily in Michigan. The economy is in the tank here. I’ve lived here all my life and don’t ever remember seeing so many people who are clearly poor."

"The manufacturing base has been destroyed by NAFTA and the greed of the big unions. It’s a disaster. People are looking for a new FDR, I don’t think it’s Barry."

...except that Obama has already preached that he'll start enormous make-work construction projects and feed an increase in manufacturing. Hillary has a record of turning welfare into work-fare with more of a family-invasion twist.

Obama Proposes $210 Billion for New Jobs
AP/Google ^ | 2/13/08 | Nedra Pickle

"JANESVILLE, Wis. (AP) — Democrat Barack Obama said Wednesday that as president he would spend $210 billion to create jobs in construction and environmental industries, as he tried to win over economically struggling voters."

There are no candidates in favor of increasing manufacturing in the USA. Duncan Hunter was the only one. The heavy import paradigm will come to an end, regardless of politics here, though. For one example, US imports from China now comprise only a small part of China's export market. Chinese people are demanding and buying more products.

As the Chinese economy continues to heat up over the years ahead, Chinese people will pay more yuan for each product. Because of that domestic demand, more dollars will also be required to buy each product, as will more of other world currencies.

Other once-third-world nations are also buying a lot from China. She doesn't need us as much as she used to.

China set for 30 years more years of fast growth: World Bank's Li
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1981779/posts

China's has been feeling and paying deference to our "recession" party less than nations. The downturn in goods from China to the USA is only slight and gradual. And that's the way it will be, until we call off our "recession." Oil will continue to go up, too, all in all.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.