Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
It bothers me that they keep refering to this bomb as small. Any pedestrian that would have been walking by could have been killed or severely injured by this blast.

By the standards of Iraq or Israel, it was, in fact, a "small" bomb. Using an appropriate adjective doesn't imply that it's not a bomb or not potentially lethal.

Here's what a "not-small" terrorist bomb does:


328 posted on 03/11/2008 5:13:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

When the abortion clinic in the south was attacked a few years ago, the bomb was no more menacing than this one, but I’ll bet you don’t find one reference to it as ‘small’.

What I object to is the overplay with regard to one incident and the downplaying of another.

The recruiting office was not a ‘protected’ target. Thus it’s attack was small. The attack on the clinic was serious and a real threat.

That’s my take on it.


329 posted on 03/11/2008 7:14:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson