Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home Equity Falls Below 50 Percent
Yahoo! Finance ^ | March 6, 2008

Posted on 03/06/2008 9:36:15 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot

Federal Reserve Report Shows Homeowner Equity Dipping Below 50 Percent, Lowest on Record

NEW YORK (AP) -- Americans' percentage of equity in their homes has fallen below 50 percent for the first time on record since 1945, the Federal Reserve said Thursday. Homeowners' percentage of equity slipped to a revised lower 49.6 percent in the second quarter of 2007, the central bank reported in its quarterly U.S. Flow of Funds Accounts, and declined further to 47.9 percent in the fourth quarter -- the third straight quarter it was under 50 percent. That marks the first time homeowners' debt on their houses exceeds their equity since the Fed started tracking the data in 1945.

The total value of equity also fell for the third straight quarter to $9.65 trillion from a downwardly revised $9.93 trillion in the third quarter.

Home equity, which is equal to the percentage of a home's market value minus mortgage-related debt, has steadily decreased even as home prices jumped earlier this decade due to a surge in cash-out refinances, home equity loans and lines of credit and an increase in 100 percent or more home financing.

Economists expect this figure to drop even further as declining home prices eat into the value of most Americans' single largest asset.

Moody's Economy.com estimates that 8.8 million homeowners, or about 10.3 percent of homes, will have zero or negative equity by the end of the month. Even more disturbing, about 13.8 million households, or 15.9 percent, will be "upside down" if prices fall 20 percent from their peak.

The latest Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index showed U.S. home prices plunging 8.9 percent in the final quarter of 2007 compared with a year ago, the steepest decline in the 20-year history of the index.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: doomage; equity; homeowner; homeowners; realestate; wealth; wearedoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
I'm surprised Americans have any equity in their homes.
1 posted on 03/06/2008 9:36:15 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Just Wow!


2 posted on 03/06/2008 9:36:36 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Mase; expat_panama; Rusty0604; Jim 0216; xjcsa; VegasCowboy; ex-Texan; Fan of Fiat; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 03/06/2008 9:37:21 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The problem is not the 50%’s. The problem is the -30%’s
4 posted on 03/06/2008 9:38:07 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

and yet, Dems still pledge to raise taxes on America for their healthcare initiative


5 posted on 03/06/2008 9:39:38 AM PST by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I believe that this value will continue to fall for some time. I further believe that when this value turns positive it will be a powerful signal to indicate the bottom of the market has or is just about to occur. In other words, don’t buy if you can avoid it until this indicator goes positive.


6 posted on 03/06/2008 9:40:09 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Does this count negative equity? Or is 0% as low as you can go for this calc?


7 posted on 03/06/2008 9:41:35 AM PST by VegasCowboy ("...he wore his gun outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sappy

and yet, Dems still pledge to raise taxes on America for their healthcare initiative...
:::::
Washington, and specifically the Dims, remains TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL. They are methodically and insanely destroying America with excessive taxation and regulation, malfeasance, disregard for the Constitution and our system of laws. We see its disasterous impact daily now.


8 posted on 03/06/2008 9:42:31 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Toddsterpatriot
first time on record since 1945

That's when houses were $5000. Some people pay that much on their mortgage every month now.

10 posted on 03/06/2008 9:45:44 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VegasCowboy
Does this count negative equity? Or is 0% as low as you can go for this calc?

Good question. I think they take the value of all homes and compare to the amount of all mortgages. I think they do count individuals with negative equity in this calculation.

11 posted on 03/06/2008 9:47:18 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

“..... big socialist government will save you and stick all the other home owners who are paying their bills on time with the tab.”

This is exactly what is going to happen.

It is already happening with increasingly insane cost of “higher education”: funding for those who CHOOSE not to sacrifice for their children’s education paid for by those that are.


12 posted on 03/06/2008 9:49:00 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VegasCowboy
This is a strangely written story.

If what you owe is more than what the house is worth, then you have -zero- equity. I guess this story is saying more people are upside down than have equity. (?)

When you are upside down on your loan (owe more than the value) I guess you could say it is negative equity?.

13 posted on 03/06/2008 9:49:06 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sappy; All

I doubt that the people for whom the Dems pledge to raise taxes are the ones suffering forclosure on their primary residences, or if they are they should have been smart enough or educated enough not to make foolish investments at 100% financing. Of course there are probably people with higher incomes who made investments or bought a McMansion that they may no longer be able to afford, but at least if they have enough income to be the target of higher taxes, they also have enough income to afford health insurance.


14 posted on 03/06/2008 9:50:30 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

15 posted on 03/06/2008 9:50:34 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Wasn’t Bush the one, who stepped into office promising to establish a culture of american private ownership ?

Now it’s safe to say that failure is getting an all new standard set at the moment.


16 posted on 03/06/2008 9:55:59 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You had to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see this coming. I decided to stay put and pay off my home five years ago instead of buying a bigger house like many of my friends and I’m glad I did.


17 posted on 03/06/2008 9:56:10 AM PST by kempo (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

It is already happening with increasingly insane cost of “higher education”: funding for those who CHOOSE not to sacrifice for their children’s education paid for by those that are.


You think education costs are bad now...wait until libs (McCain included) get this DREAM Act passed.....and we subsidize illegal alien college education. Talk to me about education costs then.....


18 posted on 03/06/2008 10:10:04 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (McCain/Hillary/Obama: All Liberals To Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Of course the amount of equity has dropped! That’s what several years of a building boom will do for you. When the masses are buying new houses, they aren’t going to have a lot of equity.

This just echoes the fact that millions of Americans are well-off enough to have bought new houses recently.

That’s a good thing.


19 posted on 03/06/2008 10:22:31 AM PST by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

This must be vs mortgage value, not new value.


20 posted on 03/06/2008 10:26:17 AM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson