Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: ‘Be careful what you wish for, Rush’
The Hill ^

Posted on 03/05/2008 6:46:48 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Clinton: ‘Be careful what you wish for, Rush’ By Klaus Marre Posted: 03/05/08 09:30 AM [ET]

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), buoyed by important victories in the Democratic primaries in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, on Wednesday offered some words of warning to conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who had urged Republicans to vote for her as the presumptively easier Democrat to beat.

“Be careful what you wish for, Rush,” Clinton said on Fox News.

For the second time during this campaign season, the former first lady survived what many viewed as a potential knockout punch from frontrunning Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.). While Obama maintains a significant delegate lead, he was unable to seal the nominations Tuesday night, having to concede another two populous states to Clinton.

“By getting the most delegates, by having won twice as many states, by having a lead in the popular vote we feel as if we are on pace to get the nomination,” Obama said Wednesday morning in an appearance on the same network. “And it will take a little longer than would be true if we weren’t running against a Clinton, but we’re still going to end up getting it.”

However, instead of being able to focus on Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the newly crowned Republican nominee, Obama must now continue to expend his considerable resources on the Democratic primary.

The Clinton campaign is seeking to use the breathing room the former first lady was given in polling places in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island to map out its “path to the presidency,” as a memo from strategists Harold Ickes and Mark Penn was labeled.

In the document, the Clinton team says it is “time for a second look” on the race and the candidates and argued that the “momentum has swung

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; democratparty; elections; hillary; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-465 next last
To: fightinJAG

I voted for Obama in Wisconsin in order to kill Hillary. It should have worked sigh. Rush made a huge miscalculation.


341 posted on 03/05/2008 9:00:27 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

Then they will kiss and make up, their supporters will go “oh, okay, if they can come together for the good of the country, so can we” and there you have it.

In the meantime, this has given both Rat candidates weeks and weeks of more free publicity and domination of the MSM and so on.


342 posted on 03/05/2008 9:01:07 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
“Be careful what you wish for, Rush,” Clinton said on Fox News.

Yup.

343 posted on 03/05/2008 9:01:36 AM PST by nutmeg (Obama supporters: Drink the Kool-Aid? Yes we can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
We useda have intellectuals who could think and write, like the late William F. Buckley. Now, in the post-literate society, we have radio loudmouths like Limbo and Savage. That's progress.

Al Frankenstein tells lefties how to vote, and Limbo tells Limbomaniacs how to vote. And they do, obediently. What's the difference then between the two groups of sheep?

344 posted on 03/05/2008 9:03:42 AM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

This was recently posted on FR...I think Repubs listened to Rush. To bad he was wrong this time.

n Texas, Clinton won by approximately only 98,000 votes. There in Texas there was also a much smaller number of Republicans voting for McCain and Huckleby. It’s sure very reasonable to think that at least 98,000 Republicans crossed over in Texas.


345 posted on 03/05/2008 9:03:51 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

There is no difference.


346 posted on 03/05/2008 9:04:21 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Yep. Only McGovern could make the liberal Nixon look like the conservative choice. That’s why Mcain needs the run against the democrat furthest to the left.

I can’t wait to hear what Rush has to say for himself.

347 posted on 03/05/2008 9:04:41 AM PST by Blue State Insurgent (Superdelegates = The Guardian Council)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Yes, but party bosses WILL pressure them to team up. That will be the price they each pay for getting the superdelegates to line up.


348 posted on 03/05/2008 9:04:55 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: BuckyKat

I agree with you. Why would one ever think that voting for evil is a good strategy? Makes absolutely no sense.

This may come back to haunt the repubs.


349 posted on 03/05/2008 9:04:58 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

Re: Rush didn’t tell us to vote for any conservative but now tells us to voter for Hillary. Amazing.

Precisely.

And what many people fail to realize is how powerful the power of suggestion is. People who would not have even considered doing such a thing may do it if it is not considered wacky. And it doesn’t take much to change momentum.

This is idiocy. Pure and simple.


350 posted on 03/05/2008 9:06:45 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

I wasn’t able to listen yesterday. We’ll see about today.

But you gotta wonder if such callers would make it through the callscreener.

Plus, soon Rush will start rationalizing-—Hildy’s easier to beat, etc., this will be SO GREAT if they’re both on the ticket . . . blah blah blah.

Rush, God love him, has a terrible record on analyzing the Hildabeast. He has consistently been thoroughly WRONG.

And it’s not looking good here.


351 posted on 03/05/2008 9:08:44 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: twigs
McCain does NOT want the fairness doctrine back.

HAH! McCain loves censorship of any and all political speech... see: John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts...

Look for a spiteful and vindictive President McCain to reign in those who dare call his immagration bill 'shamnesty' or conservative talk radio who didn't fall lock step behind him when he bacame the front-runner. Don't think so? He'll try it with an executive order if he could get away with it.

352 posted on 03/05/2008 9:09:44 AM PST by DaveMSmith (Nothin' worse than a leaky dame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

The chance to be the first woman VP? In an administration with a young newbie who won’t be able to push her around? And Bubba still gets to fly on Air Force 2?

She won’t pass it up. She’ll do it for “the good of the country.”


353 posted on 03/05/2008 9:09:58 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
1. If Clinton and Obama basically tie in the remaining 12 contests, Obama would need 164 superdelegates to come his way to put him over the magic number of 2,0242. Assuming no currently committed superdelegates switched and no uncommitted superdelegates jumped off the fence.

Clinton would need to win 59% of the delegates in the remaining 12 contests in order to overtake Sen. Obama's delegate lead.

If the upcoming 611 delegates at stake split 59/41 for Clinton -- 360 would go to Clinton and 251 would go to Obama -- netting Sen. Clinton 109 delegates. . . which would be enough to overcome Obama's current 106 delegate lead.

3. There are 611 delegates up for grabs in the remaining 12 contests

One important note is that Obama is heavily favored in Mississippi and NC, which have a total of 148 pledged delegates at stake or almost one third of the remaining outstanding. So if Obama pads his delegate count in these two states, Hillary would have to win the remaining states by even larger margins than 59%. A very tall order.

That means he would need to win 77% of all the remaining pledged delegates to hit the magic number of 2,024 to secure the nomination. That is highly unlikely due to the proportional delegate allocation rules in the Democratic Party.

Clinton would need to win 94% of all the remaining pledged delegates to hit the magic number of 2,024. (ABC News currently has her at 1449.)

So, clearly they both are going to be relying on superdelegates to secure the nomination.

354 posted on 03/05/2008 9:10:21 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Good points.


355 posted on 03/05/2008 9:11:03 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

Maybe. But I’ll take him ANY DAY over the Dems running. I just don’t understand this hatred of McCain. It doesn’t help any of us.


356 posted on 03/05/2008 9:12:28 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Another good point. I like talking with you.

That said, even if McCain couldn’t get paid media, he’s still pretty good at getting earned media.

And the more the Rat nominee is out there throwing stuff at him, the more McCain would be asked to respond. Plus McCain has the White House-—Bush would be glad to invite him to events and give him opportunities for media and fundraising that would go a long way.

All in all-—despite your excellent points, which I appreciate-—I continue to conclude that the Rush strategy was ill-advised on a number of fundamental levels.


357 posted on 03/05/2008 9:14:46 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Do you deny that Hildy was dead and now she lives?

Yes. You're believing the Mainstream Mediot spin that she "was dead" - in fact, her polling showed her closing the gap for more than a week. She was going to win Ohio, Texas, and Rhode Island, GOP crossovers or not. That is the fact you're missing in your desire to bash Rush.

Look, think what you want of Rush - just don't assume your feelings have any basis in facts, because the results show otherwise.

358 posted on 03/05/2008 9:15:06 AM PST by TonyInOhio (Dedicated to the preservation of American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
I voted for Obama in Wisconsin in order to kill Hillary. It should have worked sigh. Rush made a huge miscalculation

As I did in Virginia. The result was outstanding. Hillary soundly defeated, her hopes dashed, and her base despirited and demotivated. It not only took her down, but everyone associated with her campaign, her elected allies, her interest groups. Campaign insiders were at each others throats, pointing fingers. Real damage. She had defeat written all over her face after the humiliation of Wisconsin. It was working.

This just rallies both camps. They both succeed. They're both strong now. There on the same side of most every issue. It's actually a beauty contest, and most Dems like both of them. Now there both on display for they're respective camps to admire with more free media exposure than they could ever dream about purchaing.

This can only server to build the Dems up.

Wrong call Rush. 180 degrees wrong. It would be far more damaging to have taken her completely out, destroyed her political viability and the whole rotten machine surrounding her.
359 posted on 03/05/2008 9:15:08 AM PST by info_scout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: info_scout

Yes, just review the turn-out numbers for each party in the primaries.

Wow.


360 posted on 03/05/2008 9:16:30 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-465 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson