It’s called National Suicide, and it’s cause is socialist liberals getting control of the law-making and judicial processes and letting an invasion take place.
When one’s race is truly threatened, there’s nothing “racist” about fighting back. When the Jews were being exterminated, they should have fought back (I know about the Warsaw Ghetto, but it was an isolated incident). They didn’t, and they almost were wiped out. They surrendered their weapons like good law-abiding citizens, and were slaughtered.
Are the Dutch “allowed” to own firearms? Probably not. My question is - who in the hell gives ANYONE the right to tell another person that they cannot own a weapon to defend themselves with?
They’re being overrun and undermined from within. Remove the socialist liberals, then the Muslims, and the problem goes away. By any means necessary.
"Norway," they note, "has far and away Western Europe's highest household gun ownership rate (32%), but also its lowest murder rate. The Netherlands," in contrast, "has the lowest gun ownership rate in Western Europe (1.9%) ... yet the Dutch gun murder rate is higher than the Norwegian."
link
There are about 80,000 people with a gun license in the Netherlands. 2002
and fwiw from Wiki...
Dutch gun law is typical of the Western European approach. Firearm possession is not subject to any constitutional protections, but regulated simply in the Arms and Ammunition Act (Wet Wapens en Munitie). Weapons, including firearms, are divided into four categories, and for each of the categories a certain maximum punishment is set for "voorhanden hebben" (possession), and "dragen" (carrying in public).
Only citizens who are members of hunting and shooting sports clubs may obtain licences for weapons. And even then they may only get a licence for category III weapons (sports weapons).
Firearm possession and use by the military and the police is not subject to Arms and Ammunition Act, but regulated separately.
Sale is only for those age 17 or over.