To: NoGrayZone
I’ve lived though it. Your foolish approach will cause me to live through it again, which is why I’m trying to get you out of your “feeling center” and to start thinking rationally (if this is possible). Winning does not start with losing. It starts with winning. And it continues by winning again, no matter what the percentage. Reagan was happy to gain 60% at times. Why not you?
1,300 posted on
03/04/2008 7:51:29 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
You have lived through 3 liberal socialists running for president? Exactly when did that occur? You are the fool, not I.
1,323 posted on
03/04/2008 7:55:19 PM PST by
NoGrayZone
(A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
What “gain” is there in a McCain presidency? He asked to be the Dem VP just four years ago. He’s personally authored some of the worst bills for freedom and Republicans over the past 10 years. What 60% gain do you see in this?
1,352 posted on
03/04/2008 8:00:14 PM PST by
Teacher317
(Eta kuram na smekh)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham; All
I think it bears noting to everyone that it was Richard Nixon, the last true conservative bruising battler we had, who said the GOP nominee needs to run like hell to the center to win the general election. It does not hurt for our nominee to devise a strategy that wins. It does hurt if anything is done to elect the democrats who are every bit as left wing as George McGovern, who was trounced by "Tricky Dicky". And I use that title affectionately.
Some of you geniuses think it was smart to help Hilary tonight. If you can be that convoluted then you should be tricky enough to win whatever it takes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson