Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon, Catholic doctrines can collide (No coffee, tea in polling place?)
East Valley Tribune ^ | March 1, 2008 | Lawn Griffiths

Posted on 03/03/2008 11:08:00 AM PST by greyfoxx39

Religious and cultural traditions collide in odd ways.

• Is it right to tell election poll workers, assigned to Mormon church meeting houses, to not bring coffee, sodas or anything else caffeinated to refresh themselves during their long day tending to voters?

-SNIP-

First, let’s look at the polling place duties and sipping Maxwell House in the meeting house.

Longtime Tempe poll worker Mary Ann Hemmingson has signed up to work the polls for the March 11 election. She’ll spend her 14- or 15-hour day in a church, but no longer one that belongs to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

“I never sign up to work at a Mormon church because the board workers there are not allowed to have any caffeine on the premises,” she said. “That means no coffee in the morning and no Diet Coke in the afternoon. ... You don’t want to see what I look like without my daily dose of caffeine. It’s not a pretty picture.”

“The Word of Wisdom” portion of the Doctrine and Covenants, put forth in 1833 by church founder and prophet Joseph Smith, says that “hot drinks are not for the body or belly.” Add to that what H. Burke Peterson, first counselor in the Presiding Bishopric, said in 1975: “We know that cola drinks contain the drug caffeine. We know caffeine is not wholesome nor prudent for the use of our bodies. It is only sound judgment to conclude that cola drinks and any others that contain caffeine or other harmful ingredients should not be used.”

Advising followers to restrict what they take into their bodies is one thing, but applying that mandate to those people who perform a public job inside their buildings in a one-day stint seems to be taking things too Far.

(Excerpt) Read more at eastvalleytribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholic; elections; lds; mormon; mormonism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 721-739 next last
To: pby; greyfoxx39; Godzilla
I have voted in post offices, schools and churches and have never had a problem abiding by the rules in these facilities.

Have you voted in a Mosque?

And would you have a problem if you had to take off your shoes, cover your head (if you are a man) or cover your face (if you are a woman) and break for prayer 5 times during the election day?

321 posted on 03/04/2008 11:58:56 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

For all the reasons I gave. I would trust that this is not going to be some silly “well you supported evil back here” sort of stuff. That has really gotten old, you know?


322 posted on 03/04/2008 11:59:13 AM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Old Mountain man; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN

Then you would support the Muslims requiring that all women precinct workers in their Mosques to cover their faces and break for prayer 5 times a day?
_____________________________________________

Really ???????????????

Wouldnt that make the votes insecure...if left alone ???


323 posted on 03/04/2008 11:59:32 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Good point. Don’t use a mosque for a polling place.


324 posted on 03/04/2008 12:01:22 PM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
Seems that there may be a selective enforcement of 'rules' if that is your point?

That is my point. It seems the rule enforcement might just be a tad bit sanctimonious to me.

325 posted on 03/04/2008 12:02:24 PM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man; greyfoxx39; colorcountry; pby
I would not think any sane Christian woman would submit to those conditions for employment.

I would not think that any sane "Christian" woman would enter into an LDS Church and "submit" to their prohibition on coffee or Pepsi.

326 posted on 03/04/2008 12:03:07 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man
For all the reasons I gave. I would trust that this is not going to be some silly “well you supported evil back here” sort of stuff. That has really gotten old, you know?

I have no idea what you are talking about.

327 posted on 03/04/2008 12:04:17 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Dear CC, perhaps you should rein in your apparent anger and avoid name calling here. You know how many of us resent our Church being assaulted for no good reason.


328 posted on 03/04/2008 12:04:22 PM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Today, and today only, I am not going to go to war with you about anything. No matter how nasty you get so go ahead and take your best shots.


329 posted on 03/04/2008 12:06:18 PM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Today, and today only, I am not going to go to war with you about anything. No matter how nasty you get so go ahead and take your best shots.


330 posted on 03/04/2008 12:06:59 PM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man; Tennessee Nana; MHGinTN; greyfoxx39; colorcountry
Good point. Don’t use a mosque for a polling place.

If you are going to allow Churches to act as polling places and to dictate dress codes and dietary codes to the precinct workers, then you are going to have to allow Mosques to do the same. And if Mormons can prohibit caffeinated drinks, then Muslims can require women to cover their faces.

331 posted on 03/04/2008 12:07:43 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; pby

I think the three of us know exactly WHY the Mormon Church is placing this restriction.

How about tatoos. Mormonism prohibits tatoos. Should we extend the prohibition against tatoos, or multiple piercings?

It isn’t like coffee, tea or cola are abhorrent substances that would actually defile the BUILDING in any way. Mormons allow food and drink into the building during many social functions. The only time of defilement is to Mormons who partake of the substances. The substances themselves are not “evil.” This is nothing like a ham sandwich.


332 posted on 03/04/2008 12:08:16 PM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man
No matter how nasty you get so go ahead and take your best shots.

Where have I ever been "nasty" to you?

333 posted on 03/04/2008 12:08:32 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

would you have a problem if you had to take off your shoes,
_________________________________________________

To visit the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem 20 years ago, we had to take our shoes off...

Waaaaaaay outside several yards away from the building...

That was the only restriction though...

We got to keep our Bibles...

now no Bibles are allowed...

I dont know if women can go in or go in uncovered as the moslems own the property now..

The mosques in the US have strict rules..Sharia Law stuff...

So I doubt they would be accepable as polling places...

Of course the ACLU would not care...

The churches here have rules on clothing but they arent pushed on polling days...


334 posted on 03/04/2008 12:09:20 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man

Name-calling?? Link please.


335 posted on 03/04/2008 12:09:34 PM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Have you voted in a Mosque? And would you have a problem if you had to take off your shoes, cover your head (if you are a man) or cover your face (if you are a woman) and break for prayer 5 times during the election day?

IMHO, voting is different from working the polls. However I would have a problem with this as it forces me to adopt their requirements before I could VOTE, and my constitutional right overrides the religious codes that would seek to force me to recognize islam against my personal beliefs. If a facility is open to the public for this secular/governmental function, it must with hold its requirements or host it in a part of the facility that these requirements are not necessary.

This would go double for non-islamic women who would seek to do their civic duty as poll workers. This example, perhaps makes the rub against no coffee, etc for poll workers in a mormon facility so irritating for many here. Beverage prohibitions in the facility to protect carpets, etc are reasonable - it affects all equally. But a religious restriction simply due to the presence of caffeine and its use by non-members really starts stretching that limit IMHO.

336 posted on 03/04/2008 12:10:16 PM PST by Godzilla (Have you laughed at a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man

Don’t use a mosque for a polling place.
__________________________________________

Watch it OMM...

We agree on something

:)


337 posted on 03/04/2008 12:11:21 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

You should run for office and then get a law enacted requiring that no Churches whatsoever be used as polling places.


338 posted on 03/04/2008 12:12:19 PM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
That is my point. It seems the rule enforcement might just be a tad bit sanctimonious to me.

Very valid point, waiver one rule yet stick to another.

339 posted on 03/04/2008 12:12:27 PM PST by Godzilla (Have you laughed at a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
What about the clothing restrictions I mentioned. Mormon women would not be allowed to enter the ward house in shorts. Would you agree to a like restriction on voters or poll workers based upon this particular LDS taboo?

=+=+=

You seem to have missed the woman’s volleyball and basketball games if you have never seen the Sisters in shorts in the ward house.

340 posted on 03/04/2008 12:13:35 PM PST by fproy2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 721-739 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson