Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Campaigners bid to clear the 'witch' who leaked WWII secrets about sinking battleship[UK]
Daily Mail ^ | 01 Mar 2008 | Andy Dolan

Posted on 03/02/2008 10:55:54 AM PST by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2008 10:55:57 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

There’s some famous footage of the Barham capsizing and blowing up. It appears on The History Channel every time the show involves a ship exploding, but is never identified as the Barham.


2 posted on 03/02/2008 10:59:54 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Great story.


3 posted on 03/02/2008 11:04:44 AM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The film of the Barham sinking is one of the most frequently shown sequences from WW2. It shows the ship torn apart by a massive explosion as she rolls over on her beam ends.
4 posted on 03/02/2008 11:04:49 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

What do they mean “leaked?” This sort of reminds me of the claim that Rove “leaked” Plame’s secret identity, which just like this situation, was impossible since he did not even know Plame’s identity.


5 posted on 03/02/2008 11:05:31 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

GRAB YOUR TORCH AND PITCHFORKS EVERYBODY!


6 posted on 03/02/2008 11:06:23 AM PST by MadDoctorD (Thumpin' old folk since 1988!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“leaking military secrets”

Maybe Drudge told her. :)


7 posted on 03/02/2008 11:06:34 AM PST by Taking Congress back in 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"Churchill denounced the case against her as "obsolete tomfoolery" and visited her in prison."

But she was heavier than the goose, and the goose floated.


8 posted on 03/02/2008 11:09:02 AM PST by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
A stupid law, but guilty as charged.
9 posted on 03/02/2008 11:11:54 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
jailed for nine months in 1944 under the Witchcraft Act of 1735

My ex-wife is glad that she doesn't live in Great Britian.

10 posted on 03/02/2008 11:13:26 AM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadDoctorD

11 posted on 03/02/2008 11:23:09 AM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Here. HMS Barham

http://www.worldisround.com/articles/16107/index.html


12 posted on 03/02/2008 11:24:35 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Only infidel blood can quench Muslim thirst-- Abdul-Jalil Nazeer al-Karouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
IIRC, the London Times crossword puzzle guy found himself in a pickle, too.

Leading up to D-Day, he was using the code names of various projects, including "OVERLORD".

13 posted on 03/02/2008 11:28:03 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"But Duncan, who was living in Portsmouth at the time"

Given that Portsmouth was a major naval base, maybe there was a very good chance she had actually heard something specific from a source in the Royal Navy?? If she was a major 'medium' she probably had all sorts of interesting personal connections, especially among a few wives of officers and/or sailors etc. Maybe it was a more definite 'leak' of sensitive info than all the witchcraft nonsense would suggest, and they just charged her under a convenient though ludicrous statute.....???
14 posted on 03/02/2008 11:29:57 AM PST by Enchante (Obama: I'll eagerly kiss Castro's cold dead ass, that's my foreign policy!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Quija
15 posted on 03/02/2008 11:30:44 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
I doubt there's much warrant for pardoning her. I think what leaves people agape is that there was still a "Witchcraft" law in Britain that she ended up being tried under, but according to the BBC "she was the last person in Britain to be jailed under the act, which was repealed in 1951 and replaced with the Fraudulent Mediums Act".

I don't have a problem with a Fraudulent Mediums Act, and this woman was definitely a fraud. What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

16 posted on 03/02/2008 11:33:31 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

This is similar to the case in the US during WWII (1944) when ‘Astounding’ science fiction magazing (today ‘Analog’) published a story anticipating the atomic bomb. The publisher, John W. Campbell, was visited by the FBI and accused of publishing secret material and demanding the issue be removed from newsstands. Reportedly, Campbell managed to convince the FBI that would draw more attention to the US atomic bomb program than just ignoring it. And that’s what they did.


17 posted on 03/02/2008 11:38:07 AM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

Agreed.

18 posted on 03/02/2008 11:56:28 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Essentially we have a con woman who wheedled a military secret out of one of her marks and then revealed the secret in a manner calculated to enhance the profits from her con game, without any regard for the effect it might have on the war effort.

The state could not prove who told her the secret and therefore could not secure a conviction within the normal statute, so they dusted off an older one which could be used to punish her.

The outdated law is now abolished and cannot threaten con artists anymore, she got what she deserved and there is no need to exonerate her since she did something pretty evil and disgusting.

19 posted on 03/02/2008 12:05:01 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Wonder if we could get Hitlery to go to England for an extended stay? Hmmm.


20 posted on 03/02/2008 12:06:53 PM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson