Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
I doubt there's much warrant for pardoning her. I think what leaves people agape is that there was still a "Witchcraft" law in Britain that she ended up being tried under, but according to the BBC "she was the last person in Britain to be jailed under the act, which was repealed in 1951 and replaced with the Fraudulent Mediums Act".

I don't have a problem with a Fraudulent Mediums Act, and this woman was definitely a fraud. What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

16 posted on 03/02/2008 11:33:31 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpringheelJack
What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

Agreed.

18 posted on 03/02/2008 11:56:28 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

We should ask Harry Potter if she was guilty.

26 posted on 03/02/2008 12:38:55 PM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
What seems to have drawn special attention to her is that some of her clients were privy to state secrets which she ended up leaking in order to establish her bonafides.

We should ask Harry Potter if she was guilty.

27 posted on 03/02/2008 12:40:28 PM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack

A fraud? Like our CO2, energy and clean air frauds? To each his own, I guess.


34 posted on 03/02/2008 1:02:23 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
and this woman was definitely a fraud

You again! You are apparently always "certain" about things of which you have no direct evidence. After your pathetic performance on the Shroud of Turin thread, one would think that you'd be ashamed to poke your head up on another such thread.

But, nooooooooo - here you are!

OK, I'm just going to say it. You can't prove she was a fraud . Ever. No way, no how.

It's just your opinion that she was a fraud.

O-P-I-N-I-O-N

And on the Internet, opinions are like that certain orifice - pretty much everyone's got one.

44 posted on 03/02/2008 5:57:52 PM PST by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack

Canada still has a law about witchcraft but it is about fraud, not sorcery. The Criminal Code offence of “Pretending to exercise witchcraft” is still regularly enforced in cases involving fortune-telling scams.


49 posted on 10/28/2008 3:11:49 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson