Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing loses $40B air refueling tanker bid to Northrop, EADS
Associated Press ^

Posted on 03/01/2008 8:45:57 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets

Northrop Grumman Corp. and the maker of Airbus planes won a multibillion-dollar Air Force contract to build 179 tankers used to refuel military aircraft mid-flight, a congressional staffer familiar with the award said Friday.

The staffer, who learned of the award from a Northrop Grumman employee, spoke on condition of anonymity.

The selection of Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman and European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. comes as a surprise to Wall Street and major blow to Boeing Co.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; defensecontractors; dod; eads; northrop; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2008 8:45:58 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

EADS/Northrop upsets Boeing in Air Force tanker competition — analyst
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1978471/posts

Northrop/EADS wins [Air Force] tanker contract
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978473/posts

Alabama And Mobile Excited Over $40 Billion Deal (Air Force Tanker)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978655/posts

Congress in turmoil over Air Force tanker decision
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978622/posts

U.S. Job Creation Not a Factor in Tanker Contract Award
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978620/posts


2 posted on 03/01/2008 8:51:17 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

Many threads and no answers. What are they thinking, if anything?


3 posted on 03/01/2008 8:54:20 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Thank you for posting the other articles here. I am still a FReeper “newbie” and I didn’t realize that articles about this “outsourcing”/industrial-military complex version of a Monroe Doctrine violation had already been posted.

Among the consequences of this nightmare are IMHO:

1. A foreign power will get its foot into the door of our U.S. military.

2. U.S. taxpayers will be bailing out Airbus EADS (recall the insider trading scandal and how the stocks went south???) vis a vis a United States government contract.


4 posted on 03/01/2008 9:01:48 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What are they thinking, if anything?

1. EADS/Northrup is going to produce a better product for the price the U.S. government is going to pay.

2. See #1.

5 posted on 03/01/2008 9:03:14 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

How stupid can we be as a nation and a government?

For every dollar the the Air Force spends on US made product, the funds multiply by seven times throughout the economy.

Thus a $40 Billion Boeing contract is worth $280 billion to our economy:

an Airbus $40 billion contract is worth zero!


6 posted on 03/01/2008 9:06:00 AM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

1. EADS/Northrup is going to produce a better product for the price the U.S. government is going to pay.

2. See #1.

3.... In other words: LOW BIDDER.


7 posted on 03/01/2008 9:06:49 AM PST by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

We would have no idea how stupid it is possible to be but we are doing our best to find out.


8 posted on 03/01/2008 9:07:59 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

As you can read on the other threads, a Boeing plane would have been dependent on Chinese communist parts. I personally trust the French and Germans slightly farther than I do the ChiComs.

And, for that matter, I’d rather encourage military spending in Republican states as opposed to military spending in heavily Democrat states.


9 posted on 03/01/2008 9:09:39 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
an Airbus $40 billion contract is worth zero!

You wouldn't make a very good propagandist. Good propaganda has some basis in fact.

10 posted on 03/01/2008 9:11:20 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)
Uh, no.

EADS/Northrop may simply be producing a much better aircraft for slightly more money (and in light of the comments I've seen on various threads, this could very well be the case).

I'd also suggest that Boeing didn't do itself any favors by: (1) failing to meet deadlines in the delivery of other aircraft in recent months, and (2) having a couple of its executives involved in a scandal involving potential bribery of U.S. military and/or government officials in the months leading up to this selection.

11 posted on 03/01/2008 9:23:32 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

What are they thinking, if anything?

_____________________________________________________

It looks like they are not thinking! Or if they are, their thinking doesn’t seem to be oriented in a direction that could be called “Patriotic!” Sue Payton sounds like nothing more than a “politically correct” bureaucrat who is either buying into the socialist E.U. “globalist economy” mantra herself or is parroting the E.U. mantra of some of her masters in the Pentagon.

One thing I am thinking about is this. What will become of the Department of Defense Quality Assurance inspectors whose job has traditionally been to see to it that manufacturers of military equipment are manufacturing said equipment according to government specifications spelled out in the defense contract. Is the Department of Defense going to be further downsized? Who is going to be watching Northrup EADS? If there are tanker manufacturing problems similar to the ones that delayed delivery of the civilian Airbus A380, what then? Can we put the war on pause until Northrup EADS is ready to deliver? Inquiring taxpayers want to know.

I think that we the taxpayers had better start hollering about this one!


12 posted on 03/01/2008 9:25:40 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

As you can read on the other threads, a Boeing plane would have been dependent on Chinese communist parts.
_________________________________________________________

Good point - as long as the French and Germans aren’t relying on Chinese communist parts vis a vis their suppliers.


13 posted on 03/01/2008 9:28:42 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

How stupid can we be as a nation and a government?

For every dollar the the Air Force spends on US made product, the funds multiply by seven times throughout the economy.........
_____________________________________________________

I totally agree.


14 posted on 03/01/2008 9:32:27 AM PST by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

25,000 new jobs in Alabama isn’t exactly chicken feed when it comes to putting money into the US economy...


15 posted on 03/01/2008 9:39:12 AM PST by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

And don’t forget Boeing built that $1B Secret Satellite that failed after launch and had to be shot down.


16 posted on 03/01/2008 9:57:45 AM PST by Claytonbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets
1. A foreign power will get its foot into the door of our U.S. military.

That's already been accomplished by the likes of Hawker Siddeley, DeHavilland, Dassault, Aerospatiale, FN, H&K and Beretta.

17 posted on 03/01/2008 9:58:15 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

“As you can read on the other threads, a Boeing plane would have been dependent on Chinese communist parts”

And the EADS plane would not be? The fact that Airbus and Chinese companies are working ever more closely together, including the transfer of work and technology to Chinese aerospace companies who may then utilize that knowledge for both military AND commercial applications is not an issue?

And you honestly trust the French more than the Chinese?Honestly? Despite the overt talk in Brussels of countering American economic, political and eventually military influence?


18 posted on 03/01/2008 10:04:00 AM PST by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

As you can read on the other threads, a Boeing plane would have been dependent on Chinese communist parts.

What percentage?

And why do you object to this?

Do you have issue with 48% of a plane being built by French Muslims?


19 posted on 03/01/2008 10:31:07 AM PST by NoLibZone (At the age of 50 - The Offshoring of US Military Projects Has Changed my perscpective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
As you can read on the other threads, a Boeing plane would have been dependent on Chinese communist parts. I personally trust the French and Germans slightly farther than I do the ChiComs.

I agree...Not to mention it will create about 7,500 jobs for California and other states too.

20 posted on 03/01/2008 10:34:44 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson