Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Proposition 98 vs 99: Competing Initiatives regarding Property Rights
California Secretary of State ^

Posted on 03/01/2008 8:20:57 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture

Propositions that are on the
June 3, 2008 Statewide Direct Primary Election Ballot

Initiative Constitutional Amendment
Proposition 98

1248. Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Constitutional Amendment.
Proponents: Doug Mosebar, Jon Coupal and Jim Nielsen

Bars state and local governments from condemning or damaging private property for private uses. Prohibits rent control and similar measures. Prohibits deference to government in property rights cases. Defines “just compensation.” Requires an award of attorneys fees and costs if a property owner obtains a judgment for more than the amount offered by the government. Requires government to offer to original owner of condemned property the right to repurchase property at condemned price when property is put to substantially different use than was publicly stated. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Increased costs to many governments due to the measure’s restrictions. The fiscal effect on most governments probably would not be significant. (Initiative 07-0015.) (Full Text)

Initiative Constitutional Amendment
Proposition 99

1251. Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence. Constitutional Amendment.
Proponents: Christopher K. McKenzie, Susan Smartt and Kenneth Willis c/o Steve Lucas

Bars state and local governments from using eminent domain to acquire an owner-occupied residence, as defined, for conveyance to a private person or business entity. Creates exceptions for public work or improvement, public health and safety protection, and crime prevention. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The measure would likely not have a significant fiscal impact on state or local governments. (Initiative 07-0018.) (Full Text)



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calinitiatives; eminentdomain; howardjarvis; kelo; privateproperty; prop98; prop99; propertyrights; proposition98; proposition99; rentcontrol; yeson98
WEBSITE FOR PROP 98:
http://www.yesonpropertyrights.com

WEBSITE FOR PROP 99:
http://eminentdomainreform.com

1 posted on 03/01/2008 8:20:59 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Prop 98 facts sheet

Prop 99 facts sheet


2 posted on 03/01/2008 8:25:39 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; Carry_Okie

property rights ping


3 posted on 03/01/2008 8:29:03 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
98 is worth my money in contributions.
4 posted on 03/01/2008 8:39:15 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Prop 98 endorsements
5 posted on 03/01/2008 8:41:10 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Prop 99 endorsements
6 posted on 03/01/2008 8:46:24 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

additional endorsements against Prop 98
7 posted on 03/01/2008 8:52:48 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Just put in my contribution. Good luck, Californians!


8 posted on 03/01/2008 9:22:11 AM PST by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
If in doubt, vote 98.

In addition to the standard, common sense, due process protections against abusive eminent domain actions, 98 allows the electorate to establish just compensation, compenstate for collateral losses created by public works and public policy and ends rent control when the current tenant vacates the property.

Yes, it will hamstring certain public works. Yes, it will enable gentrification. Yes, it will substantially increase the cost of public infrastructure. But, for all its negative aspects, it's exactly what the doctor ordered to eradicate the virus of liberalism in California.

Ever been to Tijuana? If 98 passes, we won't find public officials sitting and/or leaning on our cars when we come out of the store.

9 posted on 03/01/2008 10:03:40 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


10 posted on 03/01/2008 5:56:28 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson