There you go again, coughing up that miserable hairball of a statistic (and I use the "s"-word as a curse-word; you know, "lies, damned lies, and statistics")
How come I am always seeing the cain-bots spewing the "lifetime" rating, rather than the more MEANINGFUL recent rating?
Frankly, it's as laughable as hearing a public defender mouthing, "your honor I ask the court to acquit my client because this is his first offence; he has led an exemplary life and been a pillar of this community." (prior, of course, to having murdered his entire family in cold blood -- but hey, everyone's entitled to a mistake or two, right? The main thing is his "lifetime" of public service, right? LMAO!)
Hey, just between you and me -- I cain't help but ask -- are you paid to post?
Hey, joker, I also posted his ACU rating for the past year. I suggest you get a clue before you advertise your ignorance. It was 65%. That’s not as good as I’d personally like to see, but it’s about 60% better than Osamabama — who you’ll probably end up with if McCain loses.
As for “cain-bots,” you couldn’t be more wrong. McCain was essentially my last choice among Republicans. But I am wise enough to know that he is far better than either of the two top Dems. Apparently that’s more than I can say for you.